Orangebox Limited
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 12 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E04F (Finishing Work ON Buildings, e.g. Stairs, Floors).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Orangebox ranks #23,142 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 12 patents across 4 technology areas.
- #23,142
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 39%
- by Innovation Score (39.2/100)
- 5.4
- avg claims per patent
- +900%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R23142 · Foreign Corporation #23,142 · 12 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 12 grants
- MID-PACK #23,142/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Onfido
- CPC-NARROW E04F · 4 areas
- INNOV-THIN 39.2/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 5.4 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-SURGE +900% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Onfido Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Orangebox’s 39.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Orangebox
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Orangebox · this assignee
Orangebox · this assignee
39 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Orangebox's Innovation Score is 39.2/100 (top 39% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Orangebox?
Each dot is one of Orangebox’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Orangebox’s own 5.4 claims/patent is at or below the 19.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Orangebox's grants concentrate
Orangebox Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 25% of grants classified under E04F (Finishing Work ON Buildings, e.g. Stairs, Floors). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (9 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Orangebox sits between Onfido Ltd. and Origami Owl, LLC.
Orangebox's three-year grant acceleration
Orangebox Limited shows 9 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Orangebox's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Onfido
Onfido Ltd.
12 patents
- Onstream Media
Onstream Media Corporation
12 patents
- Opendoor Labs
Opendoor Labs Inc.
12 patents
- Orangedot
OrangeDot, Inc.
12 patents
- Orbital Sciences
Orbital Sciences Corporation
12 patents
- Orbital Traction
Orbital Traction, Ltd.
12 patents
- Oregon Tool
Oregon Tool, Inc.
12 patents
- Origami Owl
Origami Owl, LLC
12 patents
- Orangebox ◀
Orangebox Limited
12 patents
What this shows Orangebox holds 12 patents at rank #23,142, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Orangebox
By rank, the assignees closest to #23,142 in granted patent volume.
- Onfido Ltd. #23,138 · 12 patents
- Onstream Media Corporation #23,139 · 12 patents
- Opendoor Labs Inc. #23,140 · 12 patents
- OrangeDot, Inc. #23,141 · 12 patents
- Orbital Sciences Corporation #23,143 · 12 patents
- Orbital Traction, Ltd. #23,144 · 12 patents
- Oregon Tool, Inc. #23,145 · 12 patents
- Origami Owl, LLC #23,146 · 12 patents
Leaders in E04F (Finishing Work ON Buildings)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Orangebox's primary technology class.
Orangebox's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
39 Top 39% higher than 61% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 1 | 8.3% |
| 2021 | 1 | 8.3% |
| 2024 | 9 | 75.0% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 8.3% |
Which technologies does Orangebox Limited patent most?
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Orangebox Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Orangebox Limited's lead technology class is E04F (Finishing Work ON Buildings, e.g. Stairs, Floors), 25% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore E04F
- Ranked #23,142 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Orangebox Limited against Onfido Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 39.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.