PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

On-Bright Electronics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 316 granted patents across 15 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H02M (Apparatus FOR Conversion Between AC AND AC, Between AC AND DC, OR Between DC AND DC, AND FOR USE With Mains OR Similar Power Supply SYSTEMS; Conversion OF DC OR AC Input Power Into Surge Output POWER;).

RSS updates for this company
Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, On-bright ranks #1,338 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 316 patents across 15 technology areas.

#1,338
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 14%
by Innovation Score (49.9/100)
22.6
avg claims per patent
-33%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R1338 · Foreign Corporation #1,338 · 316 grants

GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MID 316 grants
  • TOP-DECILE #1,338/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Cummins Filtration IP
  • CPC-FOCUS H02M · 15 areas
  • INNOV-PAR 49.9/100
  • CLAIMS-DENSE 22.6 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-DOWN -33% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Cummins Filtration IP, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How On-bright’s 49.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around On-bright

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows On-bright's Innovation Score is 49.9/100 (top 14% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for On-bright?

Each dot is one of On-bright’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). On-bright’s own 22.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.7 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

On-bright vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 314.5315315.5316316.5317317.5 510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company - 317, 18.09Massachusetts Mut…Qisda Corporation - 317, 14.74QisdaUniversity of Kansas - 317, 16.95University of Kan…Cummins Filtration IP, Inc. - 316, 18.19Cummins Filtratio…THE University OF Akron - 316, 15.41THE University OF…III Holdings 12, LLC - 315, 19.43III Holdings 12Manufacturing Resources International, Inc. - 315, 15.71Manufacturing Res…Masonite Corporation - 315, 8.8MasoniteOn-Bright Electronics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. - 316, 22.59On-bright (Shangh…
On-bright vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where On-bright's grants concentrate

On-Bright Electronics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 15 CPC subclasses with 59.5% of grants classified under H02M (Apparatus FOR Conversion Between AC AND AC, Between AC AND DC, OR Between DC AND DC, AND FOR USE With Mains OR Similar Power Supply SYSTEMS; Conversion OF DC OR AC Input Power Into Surge Output POWER;). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (65 grants) versus a trough of 13 in 2022. By volume, On-bright sits between Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company and Masonite Corporation.

On-bright's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, On-Bright Electronics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. moved from 128 to 53 grants (0.41x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). Among 3,296 tracked assignees with ≥100 grants and ≥20 prior-period grants, that multiple ranks #2,857. See the growth leaderboard.

Who files at On-Bright's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows On-Bright holds 316 patents at rank #1,338, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near On-Bright

By rank, the assignees closest to #1,338 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H02M (Apparatus FOR Conversion Between AC AND AC)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in On-Bright's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for On-Bright, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In H02M (Apparatus FOR Conversion Between AC AND AC), On-Bright ranks #23 of 1,541 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (50 here).

Slack Technologies, LLC 50 Liberty Hardware MFG. Corp. 50 Christie Digital Systems USA, Inc. 50 Corindus, Inc. 50

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (22.6 here).

Berg Companies, Inc. 22.6 avg Movidius Limited 22.6 avg Rogers Corporation 22.6 avg Koss Corporation 22.6 avg

On-bright's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

50 Top 14% higher than 86% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

020406080 20152016201720182019202020212022202320242025 28
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
On-Bright Electronics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 23 7.3%
2016 20 6.3%
2017 35 11.1%
2018 29 9.2%
2019 65 20.6%
2020 39 12.3%
2021 24 7.6%
2022 13 4.1%
2023 24 7.6%
2024 16 5.1%
2025partial year 28 8.9%

Which technologies does On-Bright Electronics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. patent most?

Top 15 of 15 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

On-Bright Electronics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • On-Bright Electronics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.'s lead technology class is H02M (Apparatus FOR Conversion Between AC AND AC, Between AC AND DC, OR Between DC AND DC, AND FOR USE With Mains OR Similar Power Supply SYSTEMS; Conversion OF DC OR AC Input Power Into Surge Output POWER;), 59.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H02M
  • Ranked #1,338 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare On-Bright Electronics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. against Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 49.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.