Overall rank by patents
#2,023
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 197 granted patents across 62 technology areas, active 2015–2018. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: G02B (OPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS).
The verdict
Oculus holds 197 US patents across 62 technology areas, rank #2,023 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Oculus VR, Llc has been granted 197 US utility patents between 2015 and 2018, placing Oculus VR, Llc at rank #2,023 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 62 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 14.2 claims per patent with primary concentration in G02B (OPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS). As a US Corporation, Oculus VR, Llc is one of the broader-portfolio assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Oculus sits between State Grid Corporation Of China (198 patents, rank #2,019) and Securus Technologies, Llc (197 patents, rank #2,027) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 51.8/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 0 grants, compared with 197 in the 2015–2019 window, a -100% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Oculus VR, Llc's 14.2 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while a multi-domain presence across 62 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Oculus VR, Llc against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
State Grid Corporation of China
198 patents
Tula eTechnology, Inc.
198 patents
ABIOMED, INC.
197 patents
Intersil Americas LLC
197 patents
Pismo Labs Technology Limited
197 patents
PsiQuantum Corp.
197 patents
SORIN CRM SAS
197 patents
Securus Technologies, LLC
197 patents
Oculus VR, LLC
197 patents
What this shows Oculus holds 197 patents at rank #2,023, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #2,023 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Oculus's primary technology class.
Oculus's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
52 Top 11% higher than 89% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 1.0% |
| 2016 | 13 | 6.6% |
| 2017 | 65 | 33.0% |
| 2018 | 117 | 59.4% |
Top 15 of 62 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#2,023
Across all tracked assignees
51.8 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Oculus's 197 grants land it in the top 11% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.