Where does Neo Mechanics Limited rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Neo Mechanics Limited ranks #49,013 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Neo Mechanics Limited hold?

Neo Mechanics Limited holds 5 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2022, spanning 9 technology areas.

What is Neo Mechanics Limited's Innovation Score?

Neo Mechanics Limited has an Innovation Score of 35.2 out of 100 (top 50% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Neo Mechanics Limited focus on?

Neo Mechanics Limited's top technology area is F16J (Pistons ; CYLINDERS; Sealings) with 3 patents, ranking #204 of 753 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 9 CPC subclasses total.

Is Neo Mechanics Limited's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Neo Mechanics Limited's recent grant velocity is -33% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Neo Mechanics Limited's patents?

Neo Mechanics Limited's patents average 8.4 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Neo Mechanics Limited patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Neo Mechanics Limited

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 9 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2022. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16J (Pistons ; CYLINDERS; Sealings).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Neo ranks #49,013 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 9 technology areas.

#49,013
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 50%
by Innovation Score (35.2/100): 8.4
avg claims per patent: -33%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R49013 · Foreign Corporation #49,013 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
BOTTOM-DECILE #49,013/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Near-Miss Management
CPC-NARROW F16J · 9 areas
INNOV-THIN 35.2/100
CLAIMS-PAR 8.4 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DOWN -33% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Near-Miss Management LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Neo’s 35.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.2 pts (18%) Velocity 13.3 pts (38%) Breadth 10.6 pts (30%) Claim depth 5.0 pts (14%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Neo Mechanics · this assignee

35
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Neo's Innovation Score is 35.2/100 (top 50% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Neo?

Each dot is one of Neo’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Neo’s own 8.4 claims/patent is at or below the 12.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Neo vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Neo's grants concentrate

Neo Mechanics Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 9 CPC subclasses with 60% of grants classified under F16J (Pistons ; CYLINDERS; Sealings). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Neo sits between NeXolve Holding Company, LLC and Neores AB.

Neo's three-year grant acceleration

Neo Mechanics Limited shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Nexolve Holding

5
Near-miss Managem…

5
Necksgen

5
Nectero Medical

5
Neodiagnostix

5
Neogenis Labs

5
Neomend

5
Neores AB

5
Neo Mechanics ◀

5

What this shows Neo holds 5 patents at rank #49,132, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Neo

By rank, the assignees closest to #49,132 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F16J (Pistons)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Neo's primary technology class.

Neo's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

35 Top 50% higher than 50% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2022

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Neo Mechanics Limited patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	20.0%
2016	1	20.0%
2019	1	20.0%
2022	2	40.0%

Which technologies does Neo Mechanics Limited patent most?

F16J - Pistons ; CYLINDERS; Sealings 3

F04B - Positive-displacement Machines FOR LIQUIDS; Pumps 2

B30B - Presses IN General 1

F16M - Frames, Casings OR Beds OF Engines, Machines OR Apparatus, NOT Specific TO Engines, Machines OR Apparatus Provided FOR ELSEWHERE; STANDS; Supports 1

F16B - Devices FOR Fastening OR Securing Constructional Elements OR Machine Parts Together, e.g. Nails, Bolts, Circlips, Clamps, Clips OR WEDGES; Joints OR Jointing 1

F16F - SPRINGS; SHOCK-ABSORBERS; Means FOR Damping Vibration 1

B23K - Soldering OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; Cladding OR Plating BY Soldering OR WELDING; Cutting BY Applying Heat Locally, e.g. Flame CUTTING; Working BY Laser Beam 1

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 1

H04W - Wireless Communication Networks 1

Top 9 of 9 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Neo Mechanics Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Neo Mechanics Limited's lead technology class is F16J (Pistons ; CYLINDERS; Sealings), 60% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F16J
Ranked #49,013 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Neo Mechanics Limited against NeXolve Holding Company, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 35.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.