Overall rank by patents
#1,449
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 288 granted patents across 139 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: C09K (MATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE).
The verdict
National holds 288 US patents across 139 technology areas, rank #1,449 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
National Institute FOR Materials Science has been granted 288 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing National Institute FOR Materials Science at rank #1,449 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 139 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 12.8 claims per patent with primary concentration in C09K (MATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE). As a Foreign Corporation, National Institute FOR Materials Science is one of the broader-portfolio assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, National sits between Seescan, Inc. (289 patents, rank #1,445) and EMD Millipore Corporation (287 patents, rank #1,453) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 60.1/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 138 grants, compared with 150 in the 2015–2019 window, a -8% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. National Institute FOR Materials Science's 12.8 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while a diversified footprint across 100+ CPC subclasses spreads risk across many technology fronts. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark National Institute FOR Materials Science against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
SeeScan, Inc.
289 patents
AJOU UNIVERSITY INDUSTRY-ACADEMIC COOPERATION
288 patents
JULIUS BLUM GMBH
288 patents
Milliken & Company
288 patents
NIFCO INC.
288 patents
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MATERIALS SCIENCE
288 patents
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
287 patents
Carl Freudenberg KG
287 patents
EMD Millipore Corporation
287 patents
What this shows National holds 288 patents at rank #1,449, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #1,449 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in National's primary technology class.
National's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
60 Top 3% higher than 97% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 36 | 12.5% |
| 2016 | 28 | 9.7% |
| 2017 | 35 | 12.2% |
| 2018 | 22 | 7.6% |
| 2019 | 29 | 10.1% |
| 2020 | 20 | 6.9% |
| 2021 | 19 | 6.6% |
| 2022 | 24 | 8.3% |
| 2023 | 22 | 7.6% |
| 2024 | 34 | 11.8% |
| 2025 | 19 | 6.6% |
Top 15 of 139 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#1,449
Across all tracked assignees
60.1 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
National's 288 grants land it in the top 3% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.