Nanofluor GMBH
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 17 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C01P (Indexing Scheme Relating TO Structural AND Physical Aspects OF Solid Inorganic Compounds).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Nanofluor ranks #48,952 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 17 technology areas.
- #48,952
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 24th percentile
- by Innovation Score (27.4/100)
- 11.0
- avg claims per patent
- -75%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R48952 · Foreign Corporation #48,952 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #48,952/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Nano-x Imaging
- CPC-FOCUS C01P · 17 areas
- INNOV-THIN 27.4/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 11.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -75% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Nano-x Imaging Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Nanofluor’s 27.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Nanofluor
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Nanofluor · this assignee 27
Nanofluor · this assignee
27 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Nanofluor's Innovation Score is 27.4/100 (24th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Nanofluor?
Each dot is one of Nanofluor’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Nanofluor’s own 11.0 claims/patent is at or below the 13.2 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Nanofluor's grants concentrate
Nanofluor GMBH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 17 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under C01P (Indexing Scheme Relating TO Structural AND Physical Aspects OF Solid Inorganic Compounds). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Nanofluor sits between Nano-x Imaging Ltd. and Nanomakers.
Who files at Nanofluor's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Nano-x Imaging
Nano-x Imaging Ltd.
5 patents
- Nanobridge Semico…
Nanobridge Semiconductor, Inc.
5 patents
- Nanocomp OY
Nanocomp OY Ltd
5 patents
- Nanocyl
Nanocyl SA
5 patents
- Nanokem
Nanokem Co., Ltd.
5 patents
- Nanolive
Nanolive SA
5 patents
- Nanomab Technology
Nanomab Technology Limited
5 patents
- Nanomakers
Nanomakers
5 patents
- Nanofluor ◀
Nanofluor GMBH
5 patents
What this shows Nanofluor holds 5 patents at rank #48,950, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Nanofluor
By rank, the assignees closest to #48,950 in granted patent volume.
- Nano-x Imaging Ltd. #48,946 · 5 patents
- Nanobridge Semiconductor, Inc. #48,947 · 5 patents
- Nanocomp OY Ltd #48,948 · 5 patents
- Nanocyl SA #48,949 · 5 patents
- Nanokem Co., Ltd. #48,951 · 5 patents
- Nanolive SA #48,952 · 5 patents
- Nanomab Technology Limited #48,953 · 5 patents
- Nanomakers #48,954 · 5 patents
Leaders in C01P (Indexing Scheme Relating TO Structural AND Physical Aspec…)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Nanofluor's primary technology class.
- Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd. 231 in class
- Omya International AG 175 in class
- LG Energy Solution, Ltd. 108 in class
- Sumitomo Chemical Company, Limited 84 in class
- NGK Insulators, Ltd. 79 in class
- King Fahd University OF Petroleum AND Minerals 77 in class
- Umicore 77 in class
- Nichia Corporation 73 in class
Nanofluor's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
27 24th percentile higher than 24% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2018 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2020 | 1 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does Nanofluor GMBH patent most?
Top 15 of 17 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Nanofluor GMBH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Nanofluor GMBH's lead technology class is C01P (Indexing Scheme Relating TO Structural AND Physical Aspects OF Solid Inorganic Compounds), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C01P
- Ranked #48,952 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Nanofluor GMBH against Nano-x Imaging Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 27.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.