Where does Nanocomp OY Ltd rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Nanocomp OY Ltd ranks #48,949 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Nanocomp OY Ltd hold?

Nanocomp OY Ltd holds 5 US utility patents granted between 2017 and 2022, spanning 3 technology areas.

What is Nanocomp OY Ltd's Innovation Score?

Nanocomp OY Ltd has an Innovation Score of 34.2 out of 100 (47th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Nanocomp OY Ltd focus on?

Nanocomp OY Ltd's top technology area is G02B (Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus) with 5 patents, ranking #1,733 of 4,891 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 3 CPC subclasses total.

Is Nanocomp OY Ltd's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Nanocomp OY Ltd's recent grant velocity is +50% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Nanocomp OY Ltd's patents?

Nanocomp OY Ltd's patents average 14.2 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Nanocomp OY Ltd patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Nanocomp OY Ltd

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2022. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G02B (Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Nanocomp ranks #48,949 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 3 technology areas.

#48,949
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 47th percentile
by Innovation Score (34.2/100): 14.2
avg claims per patent: +50%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R48949 · Foreign Corporation #48,949 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
BOTTOM-DECILE #48,949/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Nano Hesgarsazan…
CPC-NARROW G02B · 3 areas
INNOV-THIN 34.2/100
CLAIMS-RICH 14.2 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-SURGE +50% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Nano Hesgarsazan Salamat Arya Ncubation Center FOR Medical Equipment AND Devices (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Nanocomp’s 34.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.2 pts (18%) Velocity 13.3 pts (39%) Breadth 6.1 pts (18%) Claim depth 8.5 pts (25%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Nanocomp OY · this assignee

34
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Nanocomp's Innovation Score is 34.2/100 (47th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Nanocomp?

Each dot is one of Nanocomp’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Nanocomp’s own 14.2 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Nanocomp vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Nanocomp's grants concentrate

Nanocomp OY Ltd is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G02B (Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Nanocomp sits between Nano Hesgarsazan Salamat Arya Ncubation Center FOR Medical Equipment AND Devices and Nanolive SA.

Nanocomp's three-year grant acceleration

Nanocomp OY Ltd shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Nano Hesgarsazan…

5
Nano Spark

5
Nano-x Imaging

5
Nanobridge Semico…

5
Nanocyl

5
Nanofluor

5
Nanokem

5
Nanolive

5
Nanocomp OY ◀

5

What this shows Nanocomp holds 5 patents at rank #48,948, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Nanocomp

By rank, the assignees closest to #48,948 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G02B (Optical Elements)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Nanocomp's primary technology class.

Nanocomp's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

34 47th percentile higher than 47% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2022

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Nanocomp OY Ltd patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2017	1	20.0%
2018	1	20.0%
2020	1	20.0%
2022	2	40.0%

Which technologies does Nanocomp OY Ltd patent most?

G02B - Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus 5

G02F - Optical Devices OR Arrangements FOR THE Control OF Light BY Modification OF THE Optical Properties OF THE Media OF THE Elements Involved THEREIN; Non-linear OPTICS; Frequency-changing OF LIGHT; Optical Logic ELEMENTS; Optical ANALOGUE/DIGITAL Converters 2

B29D - Producing Particular Articles From Plastics OR From Substances IN A Plastic State 2

Top 3 of 3 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Nanocomp OY Ltd's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Nanocomp OY Ltd's lead technology class is G02B (Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G02B
Ranked #48,949 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Nanocomp OY Ltd against Nano Hesgarsazan Salamat Arya Ncubation Center FOR Medical Equipment AND Devices, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 34.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.