PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Nano-x Imaging Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 5 technology areas, active 2020–2022. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: H01J (ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS).

Explore the portfolio See the ranking
5
Total patents granted
5
CPC technology areas
8.6
Avg claims per patent
-
5-year filing velocity

The verdict

Nano-x holds 5 US patents across 5 technology areas, rank #48,946 of 50,000 tracked assignees.

#48,946
of 50,000 US assignees by volume
Top 87%
by Innovation Score (23.7/100)
8.6
avg claims per patent

Portfolio overview

Nano-x Imaging Ltd. has been granted 5 US utility patents between 2020 and 2022, placing Nano-x Imaging Ltd. at rank #48,946 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 5 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 8.6 claims per patent with primary concentration in H01J (ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS). As a Foreign Corporation, Nano-x Imaging Ltd. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Nano-x sits between Nanjing LOPU Technology Co., Ltd. (5 patents, rank #48,942) and Nanofluor Gmbh (5 patents, rank #48,950) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 23.7/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Historical data spans 2020 through 2022, with 5 total grants over that period. Velocity comparisons require five years of historical filings to calibrate. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.

Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Nano-x Imaging Ltd.'s 8.6 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while concentration in 5 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Nano-x Imaging Ltd. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.

Who files at Nano-x's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Nano-x holds 5 patents at rank #48,946, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Nano-x

By rank, the assignees closest to #48,946 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H01J (Electric Discharge Tubes OR Discharge Lamps)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Nano-x's primary technology class.

Nano-x's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

24 Top 87% higher than 13% of 50,000 US assignees

0–10: 687 US assignees (1%). Below this entry. 10–20: 2,527 US assignees (5%). Below this entry. 20–30: 13,162 US assignees (26%). This entry sits in this band. 30–40: 15,294 US assignees (31%). Above this entry. 40–50: 11,491 US assignees (23%). Above this entry. 50–60: 5,058 US assignees (10%). Above this entry. 60–70: 1,537 US assignees (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 234 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 80–90: 10 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 90–100: 0 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0.511.522.5 202020212022 2
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2020–2022

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Nano-x Imaging Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2020 1 20.0%
2021 2 40.0%
2022 2 40.0%

Which technologies does Nano-x Imaging Ltd. patent most?

Top 5 of 5 technology areas

Patent Moat Analysis

Portfolio Volume Light
Tech Breadth Focused
Claim Depth Simple

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#48,946

Across all tracked assignees

Innovation Score

23.7 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

How many patents does Nano-x Imaging Ltd. hold?
Nano-x Imaging Ltd. holds 5 US granted patents filed between 2020 and 2022, spanning 5 technology areas.
What is Nano-x Imaging Ltd.'s Innovation Score?
Nano-x Imaging Ltd. has an Innovation Score of 23.7 out of 100. This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), filing velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).
What technology areas does Nano-x Imaging Ltd. focus on?
Nano-x Imaging Ltd.'s top technology area is H01J (ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS) with 5 patents. The company has filed patents in 5 CPC subclasses total.
Is Nano-x Imaging Ltd.'s patent filing rate increasing or decreasing?
Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for Nano-x Imaging Ltd..
What does claim depth mean for Nano-x Imaging Ltd.'s patents?
Nano-x Imaging Ltd.'s patents average 8.6 claims each. This is relatively simple claim structure, typical for focused inventions.
How is the Nano-x Imaging Ltd. patent data sourced?
All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

How to use this portfolio

Nano-x's 5 grants land it in the top 87% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

  • Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance - Nano-x ranks #48,946 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
  • Most of this portfolio concentrates in H01J - see who else leads that technology area. H01J leaders
  • Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.