Where does Nanolive SA rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Nanolive SA ranks #48,956 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Nanolive SA hold?

Nanolive SA holds 5 US utility patents granted between 2019 and 2023, spanning 7 technology areas.

What is Nanolive SA's Innovation Score?

Nanolive SA has an Innovation Score of 30.1 out of 100 (33rd percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Nanolive SA focus on?

Nanolive SA's top technology area is G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties) with 4 patents, ranking #3,181 of 7,863 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 7 CPC subclasses total.

Is Nanolive SA's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Nanolive SA's recent grant velocity is +50% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Nanolive SA's patents?

Nanolive SA's patents average 16.8 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Nanolive SA patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Nanolive SA

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Nanolive ranks #48,956 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 7 technology areas.

#48,956
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 33rd percentile
by Innovation Score (30.1/100): 16.8
avg claims per patent: +50%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R48956 · Foreign Corporation #48,956 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
BOTTOM-DECILE #48,956/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Nanocomp OY
CPC-NARROW G01N · 7 areas
INNOV-THIN 30.1/100
CLAIMS-RICH 16.8 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-SURGE +50% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Nanocomp OY Ltd (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Nanolive’s 30.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.2 pts (21%) Velocity 4.4 pts (15%) Breadth 9.4 pts (31%) Claim depth 10.1 pts (34%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Nanolive · this assignee

30
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Nanolive's Innovation Score is 30.1/100 (33rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Nanolive?

Each dot is one of Nanolive’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Nanolive’s own 16.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Nanolive vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Nanolive's grants concentrate

Nanolive SA is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 80% of grants classified under G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2021. By volume, Nanolive sits between Nanocomp OY Ltd and Nanopass Technologies Ltd..

Nanolive's three-year grant acceleration

Nanolive SA shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Nanocomp OY

5
Nanocyl

5
Nanofluor

5
Nanokem

5
Nanomab Technology

5
Nanomakers

5
Nanopaper

5
Nanopass

5
Nanolive ◀

5

What this shows Nanolive holds 5 patents at rank #48,952, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Nanolive

By rank, the assignees closest to #48,952 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Nanolive's primary technology class.

Nanolive's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

30 33rd percentile higher than 33% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2019–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Nanolive SA patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2019	2	40.0%
2021	1	20.0%
2022	1	20.0%
2023	1	20.0%

Which technologies does Nanolive SA patent most?

G01N - Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties 4

G06V - Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding 2

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 2

G06T - Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General 2

G02B - Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus 2

G03H - Holographic Processes OR Apparatus 2

G01B - Measuring Length, Thickness OR Similar Linear DIMENSIONS; Measuring ANGLES; Measuring AREAS; Measuring Irregularities OF Surfaces OR Contours 2

Top 7 of 7 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Nanolive SA's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Nanolive SA's lead technology class is G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties), 80% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G01N
Ranked #48,956 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Nanolive SA against Nanocomp OY Ltd, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 30.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.