Where does Nano Retina Ltd. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Nano Retina Ltd. ranks #18,922 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Nano Retina Ltd. hold?

Nano Retina Ltd. holds 15 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2023, spanning 12 technology areas.

What is Nano Retina Ltd.'s Innovation Score?

Nano Retina Ltd. has an Innovation Score of 32.3 out of 100 (41st percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Nano Retina Ltd. focus on?

Nano Retina Ltd.'s top technology area is A61N (ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; Radiation THERAPY; Ultrasound Therapy) with 15 patents, ranking #244 of 1,943 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 12 CPC subclasses total.

Is Nano Retina Ltd.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Nano Retina Ltd.'s recent grant velocity is -75% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Nano Retina Ltd.'s patents?

Nano Retina Ltd.'s patents average 14.6 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Nano Retina Ltd. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Nano Retina Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 15 granted patents across 12 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61N (ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; Radiation THERAPY; Ultrasound Therapy).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Nano ranks #18,922 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 15 patents across 12 technology areas.

#18,922
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 41st percentile
by Innovation Score (32.3/100): 14.6
avg claims per patent: -75%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R18922 · Foreign Corporation #18,922 · 15 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 15 grants
MID-PACK #18,922/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Murj
CPC-FOCUS A61N · 12 areas
INNOV-THIN 32.3/100
CLAIMS-RICH 14.6 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DROP -75% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Murj, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Nano’s 32.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 9.6 pts (30%) Velocity 1.7 pts (5%) Breadth 12.2 pts (38%) Claim depth 8.8 pts (27%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Nano Retina · this assignee

32
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Nano's Innovation Score is 32.3/100 (41st percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Nano?

Each dot is one of Nano’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Nano’s own 14.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 9.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Nano vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Nano's grants concentrate

Nano Retina Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 12 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under A61N (ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; Radiation THERAPY; Ultrasound Therapy). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2023. By volume, Nano sits between Murj, Inc. and NCS Testing Technology Co., Ltd..

Nano's three-year grant acceleration

Nano Retina Ltd. shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Murj

15
Myosa Pty

15
Nabors Drilling I…

15
NAN Chang O-film…

15
Nanobiotix

15
National Chin-yi…

15
National Universi…

15
NCS Testing Techn…

15
Nano Retina ◀

15

What this shows Nano holds 15 patents at rank #18,916, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Nano

By rank, the assignees closest to #18,916 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A61N (Electrotherapy)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Nano's primary technology class.

Nano's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

32 41st percentile higher than 41% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Nano Retina Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	2	13.3%
2016	4	26.7%
2017	2	13.3%
2018	2	13.3%
2019	2	13.3%
2020	2	13.3%
2023	1	6.7%

Which technologies does Nano Retina Ltd. patent most?

A61N - ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; Radiation THERAPY; Ultrasound Therapy 15

A61F - Filters Implantable Into Blood VESSELS; PROSTHESES; Devices Providing Patency TO, OR Preventing Collapsing OF, Tubular Structures OF THE Body, e.g. STENTS; Orthopaedic, Nursing OR Contraceptive DEVICES; FOMENTATION; Treatment OR Protection OF Eyes OR EARS; Bandages, Dressings OR Absorbent PADS; Firs 13

H10F - Inorganic Semiconductor Devices Sensitive TO Infrared Radiation, Light, Electromagnetic Radiation OF Shorter Wavelength OR Corpuscular Radiation 2

G11C - Static Stores 2

G08C - Transmission Systems FOR Measured Values, Control OR Similar Signals 1

H04B - Transmission 1

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 1

Y02D - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN Information AND Communication Technologies [ICT], I.E. Information AND Communication Technologies Aiming AT THE Reduction OF Their OWN Energy USE 1

G02B - Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus 1

A61B - DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification 1

G02C - SPECTACLES; Sunglasses OR Goggles Insofar AS They Have THE Same Features AS SPECTACLES; Contact Lenses 1

H10B - Electronic Memory Devices 1

Top 12 of 12 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Nano Retina Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Nano Retina Ltd.'s lead technology class is A61N (ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; Radiation THERAPY; Ultrasound Therapy), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61N
Ranked #18,922 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Nano Retina Ltd. against Murj, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 32.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.