Multibeam Corporation
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 12 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2017. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H01J (Electric Discharge Tubes OR Discharge Lamps).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Multibeam ranks #23,028 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 12 patents across 6 technology areas.
- #23,028
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 41st percentile
- by Innovation Score (32.5/100)
- 25.8
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R23028 · US Corporation #23,028 · 12 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 12 grants
- MID-PACK #23,028/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Motus Labs
- CPC-NARROW H01J · 6 areas
- INNOV-THIN 32.5/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 25.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Motus Labs, LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Multibeam’s 32.5 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Multibeam
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Multibeam · this assignee 33
Multibeam · this assignee
33 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Multibeam's Innovation Score is 32.5/100 (41st percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Multibeam?
Each dot is one of Multibeam’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Multibeam’s own 25.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.3 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Multibeam's grants concentrate
Multibeam Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under H01J (Electric Discharge Tubes OR Discharge Lamps). By volume, Multibeam sits between Motus Labs, LLC and Nanobiosys Inc..
Who files at Multibeam's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Motus Labs
Motus Labs, LLC
12 patents
- Mucell Extrusion
MuCell Extrusion, LLC
12 patents
- Mueller Industries
Mueller Industries, Inc.
12 patents
- Mulesoft
Mulesoft, LLC
12 patents
- Naade
Naade, Inc.
12 patents
- Naandanjain Irrig…
Naandanjain Irrigation Ltd.
12 patents
- Nakata Manufactur…
Nakata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
12 patents
- Nanobiosys
Nanobiosys Inc.
12 patents
- Multibeam ◀
Multibeam Corporation
12 patents
What this shows Multibeam holds 12 patents at rank #23,023, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Multibeam
By rank, the assignees closest to #23,023 in granted patent volume.
- Motus Labs, LLC #23,019 · 12 patents
- MuCell Extrusion, LLC #23,020 · 12 patents
- Mueller Industries, Inc. #23,021 · 12 patents
- Mulesoft, LLC #23,022 · 12 patents
- Naade, Inc. #23,024 · 12 patents
- Naandanjain Irrigation Ltd. #23,025 · 12 patents
- Nakata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. #23,026 · 12 patents
- Nanobiosys Inc. #23,027 · 12 patents
Leaders in H01J (Electric Discharge Tubes OR Discharge Lamps)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Multibeam's primary technology class.
- Applied Materials, Inc. 2,108 in class
- Tokyo Electron Limited 1,729 in class
- Lam Research Corporation 1,018 in class
- Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. 537 in class
- Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation 507 in class
- Shimadzu Corporation 496 in class
- Micromass UK Limited 487 in class
- Hitachi High-tech Corporation 465 in class
Multibeam's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
33 41st percentile higher than 41% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 4 | 33.3% |
| 2016 | 4 | 33.3% |
| 2017 | 4 | 33.3% |
Which technologies does Multibeam Corporation patent most?
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Multibeam Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Multibeam Corporation's lead technology class is H01J (Electric Discharge Tubes OR Discharge Lamps), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H01J
- Ranked #23,028 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Multibeam Corporation against Motus Labs, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 32.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.