Where does Mizuno USA, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Mizuno USA, Inc. ranks #32,520 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Mizuno USA, Inc. hold?

Mizuno USA, Inc. holds 8 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2018, spanning 3 technology areas.

What is Mizuno USA, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Mizuno USA, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 19.0 out of 100 (5th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Mizuno USA, Inc. focus on?

Mizuno USA, Inc.'s top technology area is A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment) with 2 patents, ranking #532 of 1,021 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 3 CPC subclasses total.

Is Mizuno USA, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Mizuno USA, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -100% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Mizuno USA, Inc.'s patents?

Mizuno USA, Inc.'s patents average 8.8 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Mizuno USA, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Mizuno USA, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Mizuno ranks #32,520 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 3 technology areas.

#32,520
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 5th percentile
by Innovation Score (19.0/100): 8.8
avg claims per patent: -100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R32520 · US Corporation #32,520 · 8 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
MID-PACK #32,520/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Miromatrix Medical
CPC-NARROW A63B · 3 areas
INNOV-LOW 19.0/100
CLAIMS-PAR 8.8 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -100% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Miromatrix Medical Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Mizuno’s 19.0 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.6 pts (40%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 6.1 pts (32%) Claim depth 5.3 pts (28%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Mizuno USA · this assignee

19
Miramar Labs · near

19
Holton Products · near

19
Quarsa · near

19
Phoenix Conveyor… · near

19
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Mizuno's Innovation Score is 19.0/100 (5th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Mizuno?

Each dot is one of Mizuno’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Mizuno’s own 8.8 claims/patent is at or below the 17.8 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Mizuno vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Mizuno's grants concentrate

Mizuno USA, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 25% of grants classified under A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Mizuno sits between Miromatrix Medical Inc. and Mobius Protection Systems Ltd..

Miromatrix Medical

8
Mission Produce

8
Mitutoyo Europe

8
Mivalife Mobile T…

8
Mo-sys Engineering

8
Mobile Aspects

8
Mobile Imaging in…

8
Mobius Protection…

8
Mizuno USA ◀

8

What this shows Mizuno holds 8 patents at rank #32,535, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Mizuno

By rank, the assignees closest to #32,535 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Mizuno's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Mizuno, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training), Mizuno ranks #532 of 1,021 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (19 here).

Miramar Labs, Inc. 19 Holton Products LLC 19 Quarsa, LLC 19 Phoenix Conveyor Belt Systems GmbH 19

Mizuno's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

19 5th percentile higher than 5% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2018

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Mizuno USA, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	4	50.0%
2016	1	12.5%
2017	2	25.0%
2018	1	12.5%

Which technologies does Mizuno USA, Inc. patent most?

A63B - Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment 2

A43B - Characteristic Features OF FOOTWEAR; Parts OF Footwear 2

A63C - SKATES; SKIS; Roller SKATES; Design OR Layout OF Courts, Rinks OR THE Like 1

Top 3 of 3 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Mizuno USA, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Mizuno USA, Inc.'s lead technology class is A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment), 25% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A63B
Ranked #32,520 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Mizuno USA, Inc. against Miromatrix Medical Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 19.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.