Where does Misapplied Sciences, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Misapplied Sciences, Inc. ranks #11,352 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Misapplied Sciences, Inc. hold?

Misapplied Sciences, Inc. holds 27 US utility patents granted between 2017 and 2025, spanning 18 technology areas.

What is Misapplied Sciences, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Misapplied Sciences, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 42.3 out of 100 (top 31% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Misapplied Sciences, Inc. focus on?

Misapplied Sciences, Inc.'s top technology area is H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television) with 20 patents, ranking #774 of 5,951 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 18 CPC subclasses total.

Is Misapplied Sciences, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Misapplied Sciences, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +50% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Misapplied Sciences, Inc.'s patents?

Misapplied Sciences, Inc.'s patents average 21.1 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Misapplied Sciences, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Misapplied Sciences, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 27 granted patents across 18 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Misapplied ranks #11,352 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 27 patents across 18 technology areas.

#11,352
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 31%
by Innovation Score (42.3/100): 21.1
avg claims per patent: +50%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R11352 · US Corporation #11,352 · 27 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 27 grants
UPPER-Q #11,352/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Marposs Societa'…
CPC-FOCUS H04N · 18 areas
INNOV-PAR 42.3/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 21.1 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +50% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Marposs Societa' Per Azioni (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Misapplied’s 42.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 11.5 pts (27%) Velocity 3.1 pts (7%) Breadth 15.0 pts (36%) Claim depth 12.6 pts (30%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Aisin Takaoka · near

42
Intuity Medical · near

42
Misapplied Sciences · this assignee

42
Redlen · near

42
Sodastream Industries · near

42
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Misapplied's Innovation Score is 42.3/100 (top 31% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Misapplied?

Each dot is one of Misapplied’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Misapplied’s own 21.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.4 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Misapplied vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Misapplied's grants concentrate

Misapplied Sciences, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 18 CPC subclasses with 74.1% of grants classified under H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (7 grants) versus a trough of 3 in 2017. By volume, Misapplied sits between Medal Sports (TAIWAN) Corporation and McMaster-Carr Supply Company.

Misapplied's three-year grant acceleration

Misapplied Sciences, Inc. shows 7 grants in 2022–2024 against only 15 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Medal Sports (Tai…

27
Mems Drive

27
Micro-epsilon-mes…

27
Microelectronics…

27
MLS ACQ

27
Marposs Societa'…

27
Mclaughlin Gormle…

27
Mcmaster-carr Sup…

27
Misapplied Scienc… ◀

27

What this shows Misapplied holds 27 patents at rank #11,342, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Misapplied

By rank, the assignees closest to #11,342 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H04N (Pictorial Communication)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Misapplied's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Misapplied, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In H04N (Pictorial Communication), Misapplied ranks #774 of 5,951 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (42 here).

Redlen Technologies, Inc. 42 Intuity Medical, Inc. 42 Aisin Takaoka Co., Ltd. 42 Sodastream Industries Ltd. 42

Misapplied's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

42 Top 31% higher than 69% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Misapplied Sciences, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2017	3	11.1%
2019	7	25.9%
2020	5	18.5%
2021	3	11.1%
2022	3	11.1%
2023	4	14.8%
2025partial year	2	7.4%

Which technologies does Misapplied Sciences, Inc. patent most?

H04N - Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television 20

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 14

G09G - Arrangements OR Circuits FOR Control OF Indicating Devices Using Static Means TO Present Variable Information 11

G09F - DISPLAYING; ADVERTISING; SIGNS; Labels OR NAME-PLATES; Seals 6

G02B - Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus 5

G06V - Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding 4

G02F - Optical Devices OR Arrangements FOR THE Control OF Light BY Modification OF THE Optical Properties OF THE Media OF THE Elements Involved THEREIN; Non-linear OPTICS; Frequency-changing OF LIGHT; Optical Logic ELEMENTS; Optical ANALOGUE/DIGITAL Converters 3

G06Q - Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory Purposes, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 3

G08G - Traffic Control Systems 2

H04S - Stereophonic Systems 1

H04R - Loudspeakers, Microphones, Gramophone Pick-ups OR Like Acoustic Electromechanical TRANSDUCERS; Deaf-aid SETS; Public Address Systems 1

A63F - Card, Board, OR Roulette GAMES; Indoor Games Using Small Moving Playing BODIES; Video GAMES; Games NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 1

G06K - Graphical Data Reading ; Presentation OF DATA; Record CARRIERS; Handling Record Carriers 1

H05B - Electric HEATING; Electric Light Sources NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Circuit Arrangements FOR Electric Light Sources, IN General 1

F21V - Functional Features OR Details OF Lighting Devices OR Systems THEREOF; Structural Combinations OF Lighting Devices With Other Articles, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 1

Top 15 of 18 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Misapplied Sciences, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Misapplied Sciences, Inc.'s lead technology class is H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television), 74.1% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04N
Ranked #11,352 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Misapplied Sciences, Inc. against Medal Sports (TAIWAN) Corporation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 42.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.