MiQ Limited
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 13 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: Y02P (Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN THE Production OR Processing OF Goods).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Miq ranks #36,511 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 13 technology areas.
- #36,511
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 31st percentile
- by Innovation Score (29.6/100)
- 16.1
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R36511 · Foreign Corporation #36,511 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #36,511/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Metronom Health
- CPC-FOCUS Y02P · 13 areas
- INNOV-THIN 29.6/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 16.1 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Metronom Health, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Miq’s 29.6 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Miq
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- MiQ · this assignee 30
MiQ · this assignee
30 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Miq's Innovation Score is 29.6/100 (31st percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Miq?
Each dot is one of Miq’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Miq’s own 16.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Miq's grants concentrate
MiQ Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 13 CPC subclasses with 42.9% of grants classified under Y02P (Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN THE Production OR Processing OF Goods). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Miq sits between Metronom Health, Inc. and Micro Turbine Technology B.V..
Who files at MiQ's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Metronom Health
Metronom Health, Inc.
7 patents
- Mettler-toledo Me…
Mettler-Toledo Measurement Technology Ltd.
7 patents
- Mezmeriz
Mezmeriz, Inc.
7 patents
- Mezmo
Mezmo Corporation
7 patents
- Miami University
Miami University
7 patents
- Miaow Intelligent…
Miaow Intelligent Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
7 patents
- Micreos Human Hea…
Micreos Human Health B.V.
7 patents
- Micro Turbine Tec…
Micro Turbine Technology B.V.
7 patents
- Miq ◀
MiQ Limited
7 patents
What this shows MiQ holds 7 patents at rank #36,506, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near MiQ
By rank, the assignees closest to #36,506 in granted patent volume.
- Metronom Health, Inc. #36,502 · 7 patents
- Mettler-Toledo Measurement Technology Ltd. #36,503 · 7 patents
- Mezmeriz, Inc. #36,504 · 7 patents
- Mezmo Corporation #36,505 · 7 patents
- Miami University #36,507 · 7 patents
- Miaow Intelligent Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. #36,508 · 7 patents
- Micreos Human Health B.V. #36,509 · 7 patents
- Micro Turbine Technology B.V. #36,510 · 7 patents
Leaders in Y02P (Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN THE Production…)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in MiQ's primary technology class.
- Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha 1,167 in class
- LG Chem, Ltd. 1,069 in class
- General Electric Company 931 in class
- Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd. 540 in class
- Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. 536 in class
- LG Energy Solution, Ltd. 508 in class
- Siemens Aktiengesellschaft 444 in class
- Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 407 in class
Miq's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
30 31st percentile higher than 31% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2017 | 4 | 57.1% |
| 2018 | 2 | 28.6% |
Which technologies does MiQ Limited patent most?
Top 13 of 13 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
MiQ Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- MiQ Limited's lead technology class is Y02P (Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN THE Production OR Processing OF Goods), 42.9% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore Y02P
- Ranked #36,511 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare MiQ Limited against Metronom Health, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 29.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.