Where does Midmark Corporation rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Midmark Corporation ranks #6,466 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Midmark Corporation hold?

Midmark Corporation holds 52 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 24 technology areas.

What is Midmark Corporation's Innovation Score?

Midmark Corporation has an Innovation Score of 40.9 out of 100 (top 34% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Midmark Corporation's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Midmark Corporation's recent grant velocity is +208% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Midmark Corporation's patents?

Midmark Corporation's patents average 7.9 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Midmark Corporation patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Midmark Corporation

Q: What technology areas does Midmark Corporation focus on?

Midmark Corporation's top technology area is A61G (Transport, Personal Conveyances, OR Accommodation Specially Adapted FOR Patients OR Disabled Persons ; Operating Tables OR CHAIRS; Chairs FOR DENTISTRY; Funeral Devices) with 10 patents, ranking #62 of 586 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 24 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 52 granted patents across 24 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61G (Transport, Personal Conveyances, OR Accommodation Specially Adapted FOR Patients OR Disabled Persons ; Operating Tables OR CHAIRS; Chairs FOR DENTISTRY; Funeral Devices).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Midmark ranks #6,466 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 52 patents across 24 technology areas.

#6,466
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 34%
by Innovation Score (40.9/100): 7.9
avg claims per patent: +208%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R6466 · US Corporation #6,466 · 52 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 52 grants
UPPER-Q #6,466/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Medivation
CPC-FOCUS A61G · 24 areas
INNOV-PAR 40.9/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 7.9 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +208% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Medivation Technologies LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Midmark’s 40.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 13.7 pts (33%) Velocity 5.2 pts (13%) Breadth 17.3 pts (42%) Claim depth 4.8 pts (12%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Kyowa Hakko Kirin · near

41
Lucid Software · near

41
Midmark · this assignee

41
Nalux · near

41
SCA Ipla Holdings · near

41
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Midmark's Innovation Score is 40.9/100 (top 34% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Midmark?

Each dot is one of Midmark’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Midmark’s own 7.9 claims/patent is at or below the 13.3 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Midmark vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Midmark's grants concentrate

Midmark Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 24 CPC subclasses with 19.2% of grants classified under A61G (Transport, Personal Conveyances, OR Accommodation Specially Adapted FOR Patients OR Disabled Persons ; Operating Tables OR CHAIRS; Chairs FOR DENTISTRY; Funeral Devices). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (13 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2016. By volume, Midmark sits between Medivation Technologies LLC and Nippon Steel & Sumikin Engineering Co., Ltd..

Midmark's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Midmark Corporation moved from 22 to 17 grants (0.77x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). See the growth leaderboard.

Medivation

52
Medtronic Bakken…

52
Mettler-toledo (C…

52
Mirus

52
Monticello Enterp…

52
Multi-chem Group

52
Nihon Nohyaku

52
Nippon Steel & Su…

52
Midmark ◀

52

What this shows Midmark holds 52 patents at rank #6,468, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Midmark

By rank, the assignees closest to #6,468 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A61G (Transport)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Midmark's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Midmark, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A61G (Transport), Midmark ranks #62 of 586 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (41 here).

Nalux Co., Ltd. 41 SCA Ipla Holdings Inc. 41 Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd. 41 Lucid Software Inc. 41

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (7.9 here).

Kabushiki Kaisha Pilot Corporation 7.9 avg Takara BIO Inc. 7.9 avg Nihon Dempa Kogyo Co., Ltd. 7.9 avg Southeast University 7.9 avg

Midmark's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

41 Top 34% higher than 66% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Midmark Corporation patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	3	5.8%
2016	2	3.8%
2017	3	5.8%
2018	2	3.8%
2019	2	3.8%
2020	13	25.0%
2021	7	13.5%
2022	6	11.5%
2023	5	9.6%
2024	6	11.5%
2025partial year	3	5.8%

Which technologies does Midmark Corporation patent most?

A61G - Transport, Personal Conveyances, OR Accommodation Specially Adapted FOR Patients OR Disabled Persons ; Operating Tables OR CHAIRS; Chairs FOR DENTISTRY; Funeral Devices 10

A61B - DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification 9

G16H - Healthcare Informatics, i.e. Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR THE Handling OR Processing OF Medical OR Healthcare Data 7

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 3

H04W - Wireless Communication Networks 3

A47B - TABLES; DESKS; Office FURNITURE; CABINETS; DRAWERS; General Details OF Furniture 3

A61C - DENTISTRY; Apparatus OR Methods FOR Oral OR Dental Hygiene 3

G06T - Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General 3

G01G - Weighing 3

A61D - Veterinary Instruments, Implements, Tools, OR Methods 2

G06V - Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding 2

H04N - Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television 2

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 1

A61M - Devices FOR Introducing Media Into, OR Onto, THE Body ; Devices FOR Transducing Body Media OR FOR Taking Media From THE Body ; Devices FOR Producing OR Ending Sleep OR Stupor 1

E05C - Bolts OR Fastening Devices FOR Wings, Specially FOR Doors OR Windows 1

Top 15 of 24 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Midmark Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Midmark Corporation's lead technology class is A61G (Transport, Personal Conveyances, OR Accommodation Specially Adapted FOR Patients OR Disabled Persons ; Operating Tables OR CHAIRS; Chairs FOR DENTISTRY; Funeral Devices), 19.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61G
Ranked #6,466 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Midmark Corporation against Medivation Technologies LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 40.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.