PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Monticello Enterprises LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 52 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06Q (Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative,).

RSS updates for this company
Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Monticello ranks #6,469 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 52 patents across 6 technology areas.

#6,469
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 32%
by Innovation Score (41.9/100)
22.8
avg claims per patent
+17%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R6469 · US Corporation #6,469 · 52 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-SMALL 52 grants
  • UPPER-Q #6,469/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Medtronic Bakken…
  • CPC-NARROW G06Q · 6 areas
  • INNOV-PAR 41.9/100
  • CLAIMS-DENSE 22.8 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-UP +17% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Medtronic Bakken Research Center B.V. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Monticello’s 41.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Monticello

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Monticello's Innovation Score is 41.9/100 (top 32% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Monticello?

Each dot is one of Monticello’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Monticello’s own 22.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 9.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Monticello vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 51.952.052.05252.052.052.1 510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Medtronic Bakken Research Center B.V. - 52, 21.13Medtronic Bakken…Mettler-Toledo (Changzhou) Measurement Technology Ltd. - 52, 9.04Mettler-toledo (C…MiRus LLC - 52, 13.29MirusMidmark Corporation - 52, 7.92MidmarkMulti-Chem Group, LLC - 52, 14.9Multi-chem GroupNihon Nohyaku Co., Ltd. - 52, 7.58Nihon NohyakuNippon Steel & Sumikin Engineering Co., Ltd. - 52, 8.08Nippon Steel & Su…Nissei Plastic Industrial Co., Ltd. - 52, 10.02Nissei Plastic In…Monticello Enterprises LLC - 52, 22.77Monticello Enterp…
Monticello vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Monticello's grants concentrate

Monticello Enterprises LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G06Q (Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative,). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (10 grants) versus a trough of 3 in 2017. By volume, Monticello sits between Medtronic Bakken Research Center B.V. and Nissei Plastic Industrial Co., Ltd..

Monticello's three-year grant acceleration

Monticello Enterprises LLC shows 15 grants in 2022–2024 against only 17 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Monticello's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Monticello holds 52 patents at rank #6,469, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Monticello

By rank, the assignees closest to #6,469 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06Q (Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Monticello's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Monticello, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G06Q (Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially…), Monticello ranks #282 of 6,520 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (42 here).

Integrity Security Services LLC 42 Lantiq Beteiligungs-gmbh & Co. KG 42 Amesbury Group, Inc. 42 Uhnder, Inc. 42

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (22.8 here).

Ultima Genomics, Inc. 22.8 avg 128 Technology, Inc. 22.8 avg OLogN Technologies AG 22.8 avg Technoprobe S.P.A. 22.8 avg

Monticello's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

42 Top 32% higher than 68% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

024681012 2016201720182019202020212022202320242025 2
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Monticello Enterprises LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2016 10 19.2%
2017 3 5.8%
2018 5 9.6%
2019 5 9.6%
2020 8 15.4%
2021 4 7.7%
2022 5 9.6%
2023 3 5.8%
2024 7 13.5%
2025partial year 2 3.8%

Which technologies does Monticello Enterprises LLC patent most?

Top 6 of 6 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Monticello Enterprises LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Monticello Enterprises LLC's lead technology class is G06Q (Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative,), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06Q
  • Ranked #6,469 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Monticello Enterprises LLC against Medtronic Bakken Research Center B.V., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 41.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.