PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Lucid Software Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 28 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

RSS updates for this company
Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Lucid ranks #10,989 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 28 patents across 7 technology areas.

#10,989
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 34%
by Innovation Score (40.9/100)
19.7
avg claims per patent
+157%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R10989 · US Corporation #10,989 · 28 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-SMALL 28 grants
  • UPPER-Q #10,989/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Karl Storz Endovision
  • CPC-NARROW G06F · 7 areas
  • INNOV-PAR 40.9/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 19.7 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-SURGE +157% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Karl Storz Endovision, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Lucid’s 40.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Lucid

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Lucid's Innovation Score is 40.9/100 (top 34% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Lucid?

Each dot is one of Lucid’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Lucid’s own 19.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.1 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Lucid vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 27.92828.1 0510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Karl Storz Endovision, Inc. - 28, 16.29Karl Storz Endovi…KAZ Europe SÀRL - 28, 2.96KAZ Europe SÀRLKocher-plastik Maschinenbau GMBH - 28, 20.54Kocher-plastik Ma…Kingsway Enterprises (UK) Limited - 28, 7.32Kingsway Enterpri…Lyve Minds, Inc. - 28, 7.07Lyve MindsLake Products Limited - 28, 18.82Lake ProductsLaser Technology, Inc. - 28, 16.32Laser TechnologyLeeo, Inc. - 28, 15.11LeeoLucid Software Inc. - 28, 19.68Lucid Software
Lucid vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Lucid's grants concentrate

Lucid Software Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 92.9% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Lucid sits between Karl Storz Endovision, Inc. and Leeo, Inc..

Lucid's three-year grant acceleration

Lucid Software Inc. shows 11 grants in 2022–2024 against only 9 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Lucid's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Lucid holds 28 patents at rank #10,980, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Lucid

By rank, the assignees closest to #10,980 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Lucid's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Lucid, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), Lucid ranks #1,666 of 13,878 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (41 here).

Goody Products, Inc. 41 Rehau AG + Co. 41 Nalux Co., Ltd. 41 Midmark Corporation 41

Lucid's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

41 Top 34% higher than 66% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0123456 2015201620182019202020212022202320242025 3
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Lucid Software Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 2 7.1%
2016 2 7.1%
2018 1 3.6%
2019 2 7.1%
2020 3 10.7%
2021 4 14.3%
2022 5 17.9%
2023 5 17.9%
2024 1 3.6%
2025partial year 3 10.7%

Which technologies does Lucid Software Inc. patent most?

Top 7 of 7 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Lucid Software Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Lucid Software Inc.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 92.9% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
  • Ranked #10,989 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Lucid Software Inc. against Karl Storz Endovision, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 40.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.