Media Blast & Abrasive, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 13 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B24C (Abrasive OR Related Blasting With Particulate Material).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Media ranks #48,635 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 13 technology areas.
- #48,635
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 32%
- by Innovation Score (42.0/100)
- 16.2
- avg claims per patent
- -33%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R48635 · US Corporation #48,635 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #48,635/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Med-Logics
- CPC-FOCUS B24C · 13 areas
- INNOV-PAR 42.0/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 16.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DOWN -33% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Med-Logics, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Media’s 42.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Media
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Media Blast & Abrasive · this assignee
Media Blast & Abrasive · this assignee
42 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Media's Innovation Score is 42.0/100 (top 32% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Media?
Each dot is one of Media’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Media’s own 16.2 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Media's grants concentrate
Media Blast & Abrasive, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 13 CPC subclasses with 60% of grants classified under B24C (Abrasive OR Related Blasting With Particulate Material). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Media sits between Med-Logics, Inc. and Medical Corporation IT.
Media's three-year grant acceleration
Media Blast & Abrasive, Inc. shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Media's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Med-logics
Med-Logics, Inc.
5 patents
- Medable
Medable Inc.
5 patents
- Mederis Diabetes
Mederis Diabetes LLC
5 patents
- Medicapture
MediCapture, Inc.
5 patents
- Media Links
Media Links Co., Ltd.
5 patents
- Mediamath Acquisi…
MediaMath Acquisition Corporation
5 patents
- Medical Care Hold…
Medical Care Holdings, Inc.
5 patents
- Medical IT
Medical Corporation IT
5 patents
- Media Blast & Abr… ◀
Media Blast & Abrasive, Inc.
5 patents
What this shows Media holds 5 patents at rank #48,801, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Media
By rank, the assignees closest to #48,801 in granted patent volume.
- Med-Logics, Inc. #48,797 · 5 patents
- Medable Inc. #48,798 · 5 patents
- Mederis Diabetes LLC #48,799 · 5 patents
- MediCapture, Inc. #48,800 · 5 patents
- Media Links Co., Ltd. #48,802 · 5 patents
- MediaMath Acquisition Corporation #48,803 · 5 patents
- Medical Care Holdings, Inc. #48,804 · 5 patents
- Medical Corporation IT #48,805 · 5 patents
Leaders in B24C (Abrasive OR Related Blasting With Particulate Material)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Media's primary technology class.
Media's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
42 Top 32% higher than 68% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2023 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2024 | 1 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does Media Blast & Abrasive, Inc. patent most?
Top 13 of 13 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Media Blast & Abrasive, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Media Blast & Abrasive, Inc.'s lead technology class is B24C (Abrasive OR Related Blasting With Particulate Material), 60% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B24C
- Ranked #48,635 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Media Blast & Abrasive, Inc. against Med-Logics, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 42.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.