Where does Omax Corporation rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Omax Corporation ranks #6,690 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Omax Corporation hold?

Omax Corporation holds 50 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 22 technology areas.

What is Omax Corporation's Innovation Score?

Omax Corporation has an Innovation Score of 46.5 out of 100 (top 21% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Omax Corporation focus on?

Omax Corporation's top technology area is B24C (Abrasive OR Related Blasting With Particulate Material) with 42 patents, ranking #2 of 114 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 22 CPC subclasses total.

Is Omax Corporation's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Omax Corporation's recent grant velocity is -34% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Omax Corporation's patents?

Omax Corporation's patents average 22.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Omax Corporation patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Omax Corporation

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 50 granted patents across 22 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B24C (Abrasive OR Related Blasting With Particulate Material).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Omax ranks #6,690 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 50 patents across 22 technology areas.

#6,690
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 21%
by Innovation Score (46.5/100): 22.0
avg claims per patent: -34%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R6690 · US Corporation #6,690 · 50 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 50 grants
UPPER-Q #6,690/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Neurocrine Biosciences
CPC-FOCUS B24C · 22 areas
INNOV-PAR 46.5/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 22.0 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DOWN -34% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Omax’s 46.5 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 13.6 pts (29%) Velocity 3.1 pts (7%) Breadth 16.6 pts (36%) Claim depth 13.2 pts (28%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Atheer · near

46
Korea Institute OF… · near

46
Magenta Medical · near

46
Nortek Air Solutions… · near

46
Omax · this assignee

46
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Omax's Innovation Score is 46.5/100 (top 21% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Omax?

Each dot is one of Omax’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Omax’s own 22.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 19.7 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Omax vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Omax's grants concentrate

Omax Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 22 CPC subclasses with 84% of grants classified under B24C (Abrasive OR Related Blasting With Particulate Material). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (11 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2022. By volume, Omax sits between Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and Oy Halton Group Ltd..

Omax's three-year grant acceleration

Omax Corporation shows 6 grants in 2022–2024 against only 13 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Neurocrine Biosci…

50
Nguyen Gaming

50
Northrop Grumman…

50
Ocean's King Ligh…

50
Ontex Group

50
OVD Kinegram

50
Oceanit Laborator…

50
Oy Halton Group

50
Omax ◀

50

What this shows Omax holds 50 patents at rank #6,687, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Omax

By rank, the assignees closest to #6,687 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B24C (Abrasive OR Related Blasting With Particulate Material)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Omax's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Omax, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In B24C (Abrasive OR Related Blasting With Particulate Material), Omax ranks #2 of 114 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (46 here).

Nortek Air Solutions Canada, Inc. 46 Magenta Medical Ltd 46 Korea Institute OF Radiological & Medical Sciences 46 Atheer, Inc. 46

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (22.0 here).

QuantumScape Corporation 22.0 avg Blue Origin, LLC 22.0 avg iboss, Inc. 22.0 avg Stradvision, Inc. 22.0 avg

Omax's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

46 Top 21% higher than 79% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Omax Corporation patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	9	18.0%
2016	3	6.0%
2017	11	22.0%
2018	6	12.0%
2020	10	20.0%
2021	3	6.0%
2022	1	2.0%
2023	4	8.0%
2024	1	2.0%
2025partial year	2	4.0%

Which technologies does Omax Corporation patent most?

B24C - Abrasive OR Related Blasting With Particulate Material 42

Y02P - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN THE Production OR Processing OF Goods 21

G05B - Control OR Regulating Systems IN GENERAL; Functional Elements OF Such SYSTEMS; Monitoring OR Testing Arrangements FOR Such Systems OR Elements 17

F16M - Frames, Casings OR Beds OF Engines, Machines OR Apparatus, NOT Specific TO Engines, Machines OR Apparatus Provided FOR ELSEWHERE; STANDS; Supports 15

G03B - Apparatus OR Arrangements FOR Taking Photographs OR FOR Projecting OR Viewing THEM; Apparatus OR Arrangements Employing Analogous Techniques Using Waves Other Than Optical WAVES; Accessories Therefor 15

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 15

B26F - PERFORATING; PUNCHING; CUTTING-OUT; STAMPING-OUT; Severing BY Means Other Than Cutting 11

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 5

F04B - Positive-displacement Machines FOR LIQUIDS; Pumps 4

F16L - PIPES; Joints OR Fittings FOR PIPES; Supports FOR Pipes, Cables OR Protective TUBING; Means FOR Thermal Insulation IN General 4

G01L - Measuring Force, Stress, Torque, Work, Mechanical Power, Mechanical Efficiency, OR Fluid Pressure 3

B65G - Transport OR Storage Devices, e.g. Conveyors FOR Loading OR Tipping, Shop Conveyor Systems OR Pneumatic Tube Conveyors 3

G01F - Measuring Volume, Volume Flow, Mass Flow OR Liquid LEVEL; Metering BY Volume 3

B21D - Working OR Processing OF Sheet Metal OR Metal Tubes, Rods OR Profiles Without Essentially Removing MATERIAL; Punching Metal 3

C21D - Modifying THE Physical Structure OF Ferrous METALS; General Devices FOR Heat Treatment OF Ferrous OR Non-ferrous Metals OR ALLOYS; Making Metal Malleable, e.g. BY Decarburisation OR Tempering 3

Top 15 of 22 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Omax Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Omax Corporation's lead technology class is B24C (Abrasive OR Related Blasting With Particulate Material), 84% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B24C
Ranked #6,690 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Omax Corporation against Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 46.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.