Medi GMBH & Co. KG
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 19 granted patents across 20 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: D04B (Knitting).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Medi ranks #15,452 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 19 patents across 20 technology areas.
- #15,452
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 24%
- by Innovation Score (45.3/100)
- 17.1
- avg claims per patent
- +83%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R15452 · Foreign Corporation #15,452 · 19 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 19 grants
- MID-PACK #15,452/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Lynx Software
- CPC-FOCUS D04B · 20 areas
- INNOV-PAR 45.3/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 17.1 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-SURGE +83% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Lynx Software Technologies, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Medi’s 45.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Medi
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Medi & KG · this assignee
Medi & KG · this assignee
45 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Medi's Innovation Score is 45.3/100 (top 24% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Medi?
Each dot is one of Medi’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Medi’s own 17.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Medi's grants concentrate
Medi GMBH & Co. KG is a focused PatentsView assignee: 20 CPC subclasses with 63.2% of grants classified under D04B (Knitting). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Medi sits between Lynx Software Technologies, Inc. and Merry Electronics (SUZHOU) Co., Ltd.
Medi's three-year grant acceleration
Medi GMBH & Co. KG shows 8 grants in 2022–2024 against only 6 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Medi's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Lynx Software
Lynx Software Technologies, Inc.
19 patents
- M-files OY
M-files OY
19 patents
- Mankiewicz Gebr &…
Mankiewicz Gebr. & Co. (GMBH & CO.KG)
19 patents
- Maquet SAS
Maquet SAS
19 patents
- Medstar Health
Medstar Health, Inc.
19 patents
- Medytox
Medytox Inc.
19 patents
- Meiko
Meiko Electronics Co., Ltd.
19 patents
- Merry (Suzhou)
Merry Electronics (SUZHOU) Co., Ltd
19 patents
- Medi & KG ◀
Medi GMBH & Co. KG
19 patents
What this shows Medi holds 19 patents at rank #15,440, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Medi
By rank, the assignees closest to #15,440 in granted patent volume.
- Lynx Software Technologies, Inc. #15,436 · 19 patents
- M-files OY #15,437 · 19 patents
- Mankiewicz Gebr. & Co. (GMBH & CO.KG) #15,438 · 19 patents
- Maquet SAS #15,439 · 19 patents
- Medstar Health, Inc. #15,441 · 19 patents
- Medytox Inc. #15,442 · 19 patents
- Meiko Electronics Co., Ltd. #15,443 · 19 patents
- Merry Electronics (SUZHOU) Co., Ltd #15,444 · 19 patents
Leaders in D04B (Knitting)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Medi's primary technology class.
Medi's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
45 Top 24% higher than 76% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 5.3% |
| 2016 | 1 | 5.3% |
| 2018 | 1 | 5.3% |
| 2019 | 3 | 15.8% |
| 2021 | 3 | 15.8% |
| 2022 | 1 | 5.3% |
| 2023 | 4 | 21.1% |
| 2024 | 3 | 15.8% |
| 2025partial year | 2 | 10.5% |
Which technologies does Medi GMBH & Co. KG patent most?
Top 15 of 20 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Medi GMBH & Co. KG's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Medi GMBH & Co. KG's lead technology class is D04B (Knitting), 63.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore D04B
- Ranked #15,452 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Medi GMBH & Co. KG against Lynx Software Technologies, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 45.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.