USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

M-files OY

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 19 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, M-files ranks #15,438 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 19 patents across 4 technology areas.

#15,438
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
26th percentile
by Innovation Score (28.0/100)
17.7
avg claims per patent
-81%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R15438 · Foreign Corporation #15,438 · 19 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 19 grants
  • MID-PACK #15,438/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Little Engine
  • CPC-NARROW G06F · 4 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 28.0/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 17.7 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-DROP -81% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Little Engine, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How M-files’s 28.0 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around M-files

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows M-files's Innovation Score is 28.0/100 (26th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for M-files?

Each dot is one of M-files’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). M-files’s own 17.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.5 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

M-files vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 18.918.91919.1 10203040 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Little Engine, LLC - 19, 17.26Little EngineLiving Proof, Inc. - 19, 16.53Living ProofLumitex, Inc. - 19, 16.05LumitexLynx Software Technologies, Inc. - 19, 38.37Lynx SoftwareMankiewicz Gebr. & Co. (GMBH & CO.KG) - 19, 17.58Mankiewicz Gebr &…Maquet SAS - 19, 12.37Maquet SASMedi GMBH & Co. KG - 19, 17.05Medi & KGMedstar Health, Inc. - 19, 13.21Medstar HealthM-files OY - 19, 17.68M-files OY
M-files vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where M-files's grants concentrate

M-files OY is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 94.7% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (6 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, M-files sits between Little Engine, LLC and Medstar Health, Inc..

Who files at M-files's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows M-files holds 19 patents at rank #15,437, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near M-files

By rank, the assignees closest to #15,437 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in M-files's primary technology class.

M-files's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

28 26th percentile higher than 26% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

02468 201520162017201820192020 3
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2020

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
M-files OY patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 6 31.6%
2016 1 5.3%
2017 3 15.8%
2018 3 15.8%
2019 3 15.8%
2020 3 15.8%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

M-files OY's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • M-files OY's lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 94.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
  • Ranked #15,438 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare M-files OY against Little Engine, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 28.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.