USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Mapper Lithography IP B.v.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record — 89 granted patents across 33 technology areas, active 2015–2019. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: H01J (ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS).

89
Total patents granted
33
CPC technology areas
24.1
Avg claims per patent
-100%
5-year filing velocity

The verdict

Mapper holds 89 US patents across 33 technology areas — rank #4,049 of 50,000 tracked assignees.

#4,049
of 50,000 US assignees by volume
Top 13%
by Innovation Score (50.3/100)
24.1
avg claims per patent
-100%
filing velocity, last 5 yrs

Portfolio overview

MAPPER LITHOGRAPHY IP B.V. has been granted 89 US utility patents between 2015 and 2019, placing MAPPER LITHOGRAPHY IP B.V. at rank #4,049 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 33 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 24.1 claims per patent with primary concentration in H01J (ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS). As a Foreign Corporation, MAPPER LITHOGRAPHY IP B.V. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. The composite Innovation Score of 50.3/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 0 grants, compared with 89 in the 2015–2019 window — a -100% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.

Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. MAPPER LITHOGRAPHY IP B.V.'s 24.1 average claims per patent reflects complex, broadly scoped inventions that are difficult for competitors to design around, while a multi-domain presence across 33 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark MAPPER LITHOGRAPHY IP B.V. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.

How does MAPPER compare?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus the largest corporate holders — this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows MAPPER holds 89 patents — placing it at rank #4,049 overall, well behind the volume leaders but ahead of the tens of thousands of smaller assignees in the dataset.

Source USPTO PatentsView — granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

MAPPER's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

50 Top 13% higher than 87% of 50,000 US assignees

0–10: 687 US assignees (1%). Below this entry. 10–20: 2,527 US assignees (5%). Below this entry. 20–30: 13,162 US assignees (26%). Below this entry. 30–40: 15,294 US assignees (31%). Below this entry. 40–50: 11,491 US assignees (23%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,058 US assignees (10%). This entry sits in this band. 60–70: 1,537 US assignees (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 234 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 80–90: 10 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 90–100: 0 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView — PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2019

0102030 20152016201720182019 3
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2019

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
MAPPER LITHOGRAPHY IP B.V. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 26 29.2%
2016 24 27.0%
2017 17 19.1%
2018 19 21.3%
2019 3 3.4%

Which technologies does MAPPER LITHOGRAPHY IP B.V. patent most?

Top 15 of 33 technology areas

Patent Moat Analysis

Portfolio Volume Light
Tech Breadth Multi-domain
Claim Depth Complex
Velocity Declining

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#4,049

Across all tracked assignees

Innovation Score

50.3 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView — US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

How many patents does MAPPER LITHOGRAPHY IP B.V. hold?
MAPPER LITHOGRAPHY IP B.V. holds 89 US granted patents filed between 2015 and 2019, spanning 33 technology areas.
What is MAPPER LITHOGRAPHY IP B.V.'s Innovation Score?
MAPPER LITHOGRAPHY IP B.V. has an Innovation Score of 50.3 out of 100. This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), filing velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).
What technology areas does MAPPER LITHOGRAPHY IP B.V. focus on?
MAPPER LITHOGRAPHY IP B.V.'s top technology area is H01J (ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS) with 67 patents. The company has filed patents in 33 CPC subclasses total.
Is MAPPER LITHOGRAPHY IP B.V.'s patent filing rate increasing or decreasing?
MAPPER LITHOGRAPHY IP B.V.'s recent filing velocity is -100% compared to the prior five-year period. Filing activity has slowed relative to earlier years.
What does claim depth mean for MAPPER LITHOGRAPHY IP B.V.'s patents?
MAPPER LITHOGRAPHY IP B.V.'s patents average 24.1 claims each. This indicates complex, broadly scoped patents that are harder for competitors to design around.
How is the MAPPER LITHOGRAPHY IP B.V. patent data sourced?
All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

Learn More

How to use this portfolio

Mapper's 89 grants land it in the top 13% by Innovation Score — but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

  • Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance — Mapper ranks #4,049 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
  • Most of this portfolio concentrates in H01J — see who else leads that technology area. H01J leaders
  • Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity — not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Explore the patent dataset

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView — official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView — the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) — the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search — the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov