Where does Magna Powertrain BAD Homburg GMBH rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Magna Powertrain BAD Homburg GMBH ranks #10,677 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Magna Powertrain BAD Homburg GMBH hold?

Magna Powertrain BAD Homburg GMBH holds 29 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2020, spanning 24 technology areas.

What is Magna Powertrain BAD Homburg GMBH's Innovation Score?

Magna Powertrain BAD Homburg GMBH has an Innovation Score of 38.7 out of 100 (top 40% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Magna Powertrain BAD Homburg GMBH's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Magna Powertrain BAD Homburg GMBH's recent grant velocity is -96% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Magna Powertrain BAD Homburg GMBH's patents?

Magna Powertrain BAD Homburg GMBH's patents average 16.1 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Magna Powertrain BAD Homburg GMBH patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Magna Powertrain BAD Homburg GMBH

Q: What technology areas does Magna Powertrain BAD Homburg GMBH focus on?

Magna Powertrain BAD Homburg GMBH's top technology area is F04C (Rotary-piston, OR Oscillating-piston, Positive-displacement Machines FOR Liquids ; Rotary-piston, OR Oscillating-piston, Positive-displacement Pumps) with 17 patents, ranking #40 of 587 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 24 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 29 granted patents across 24 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F04C (Rotary-piston, OR Oscillating-piston, Positive-displacement Machines FOR Liquids ; Rotary-piston, OR Oscillating-piston, Positive-displacement Pumps).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Magna ranks #10,677 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 29 patents across 24 technology areas.

#10,677
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 40%
by Innovation Score (38.7/100): 16.1
avg claims per patent: -96%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R10677 · Foreign Corporation #10,677 · 29 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 29 grants
UPPER-Q #10,677/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Lucyd
CPC-FOCUS F04C · 24 areas
INNOV-THIN 38.7/100
CLAIMS-RICH 16.1 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DROP -96% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Lucyd Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Magna’s 38.7 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 11.7 pts (30%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 17.3 pts (45%) Claim depth 9.7 pts (25%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
B R A H M S · near

39
Cambria County… · near

39
MacKay Memorial… · near

39
Magna Powertrain… · this assignee

39
Netsia · near

39
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Magna's Innovation Score is 38.7/100 (top 40% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Magna?

Each dot is one of Magna’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Magna’s own 16.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Magna vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Magna's grants concentrate

Magna Powertrain BAD Homburg GMBH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 24 CPC subclasses with 58.6% of grants classified under F04C (Rotary-piston, OR Oscillating-piston, Positive-displacement Machines FOR Liquids ; Rotary-piston, OR Oscillating-piston, Positive-displacement Pumps). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (9 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Magna sits between Lucyd Ltd. and Metropolitan Life Isurance Co..

Lucyd

29
Lumentum Technolo…

29
Lutronic Vision

29
Luxembourg Patent

29
Matscitechno Lice…

29
Mbte Holdings Swe…

29
Mellanox Silicon…

29
Metropolitan Life…

29
Magna Powertrain… ◀

29

What this shows Magna holds 29 patents at rank #10,676, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Magna

By rank, the assignees closest to #10,676 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F04C (Rotary-piston)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Magna's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Magna, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In F04C (Rotary-piston), Magna ranks #40 of 587 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (39 here).

MacKay Memorial Hospital 39 Cambria County Association FOR THE Blind AND Handicapped 39 B.R.A.H.M.S GMBH 39 Netsia, Inc. 39

Magna's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

39 Top 40% higher than 60% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2020

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Magna Powertrain BAD Homburg GMBH patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	3.4%
2016	2	6.9%
2017	8	27.6%
2018	9	31.0%
2019	8	27.6%
2020	1	3.4%

Which technologies does Magna Powertrain BAD Homburg GMBH patent most?

F04C - Rotary-piston, OR Oscillating-piston, Positive-displacement Machines FOR Liquids ; Rotary-piston, OR Oscillating-piston, Positive-displacement Pumps 17

F01C - Rotary-piston OR Oscillating-piston Machines OR Engines 8

F04D - Non-positive-displacement Pumps 5

F01P - Cooling OF Machines OR Engines IN GENERAL; Cooling OF Internal-combustion Engines 4

H02P - Control OR Regulation OF Electric Motors, Electric Generators OR Dynamo-electric CONVERTERS; Controlling Transformers, Reactors OR Choke Coils 3

F04B - Positive-displacement Machines FOR LIQUIDS; Pumps 3

F05C - Indexing Scheme Relating TO Materials, Material Properties OR Material Characteristics FOR Machines, Engines OR Pumps Other Than Non-positive-displacement Machines OR Engines 3

F16K - VALVES; TAPS; COCKS; ACTUATING-FLOATS; Devices FOR Venting OR Aerating 2

F25B - Refrigeration Machines, Plants OR SYSTEMS; Combined Heating AND Refrigeration SYSTEMS; Heat Pump Systems 2

F16J - Pistons ; CYLINDERS; Sealings 2

H02K - Dynamo-electric Machines 2

B60H - Arrangements OF Heating, Cooling, Ventilating OR Other Air-treating Devices Specially Adapted FOR Passenger OR Goods Spaces OF Vehicles 1

F28D - Heat-exchange Apparatus, NOT Provided FOR IN Another Subclass, IN Which THE Heat-exchange Media DO NOT Come Into Direct Contact 1

F05D - Indexing Scheme FOR Aspects Relating TO Non-positive-displacement Machines OR Engines, Gas-turbines OR Jet-propulsion Plants 1

F16D - Couplings FOR Transmitting ROTATION; CLUTCHES; Brakes 1

Top 15 of 24 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Magna Powertrain BAD Homburg GMBH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Magna Powertrain BAD Homburg GMBH's lead technology class is F04C (Rotary-piston, OR Oscillating-piston, Positive-displacement Machines FOR Liquids ; Rotary-piston, OR Oscillating-piston, Positive-displacement Pumps), 58.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F04C
Ranked #10,677 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Magna Powertrain BAD Homburg GMBH against Lucyd Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 38.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.