Overall rank by patents
#4,245
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 84 granted patents across 22 technology areas, active 2019–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: G06Q (INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE,).
The verdict
Inmar holds 84 US patents across 22 technology areas, rank #4,245 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Inmar Clearing, Inc. has been granted 84 US utility patents between 2019 and 2025, placing Inmar Clearing, Inc. at rank #4,245 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 22 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 19.6 claims per patent with primary concentration in G06Q (INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE,). As a US Corporation, Inmar Clearing, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Inmar sits between Guangdong Gopod Group Holding Co., Ltd. (84 patents, rank #4,241) and M. Technique Co., Ltd. (84 patents, rank #4,249) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 50.3/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 75 grants, compared with 9 in the 2015–2019 window, a +733% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Inmar Clearing, Inc.'s 19.6 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while a multi-domain presence across 22 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Inmar Clearing, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
GUANGDONG GOPOD GROUP HOLDING CO., LTD.
84 patents
Galapagos NV
84 patents
IGNITE USA, LLC
84 patents
IMRA America, Inc.
84 patents
Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
84 patents
JTEKT EUROPE
84 patents
KITAGAWA INDUSTRIES CO., LTD.
84 patents
M. TECHNIQUE CO., LTD.
84 patents
INMAR CLEARING, INC.
84 patents
What this shows Inmar holds 84 patents at rank #4,245, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #4,245 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Inmar's primary technology class.
Inmar's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
50 Top 13% higher than 87% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 9 | 10.7% |
| 2020 | 3 | 3.6% |
| 2021 | 27 | 32.1% |
| 2022 | 20 | 23.8% |
| 2023 | 10 | 11.9% |
| 2024 | 9 | 10.7% |
| 2025 | 6 | 7.1% |
Top 15 of 22 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#4,245
Across all tracked assignees
50.3 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Inmar's 84 grants land it in the top 13% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.