Where does LT Materials Co., Ltd. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), LT Materials Co., Ltd. ranks #7,434 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does LT Materials Co., Ltd. hold?

LT Materials Co., Ltd. holds 44 US utility patents granted between 2020 and 2025, spanning 6 technology areas.

What is LT Materials Co., Ltd.'s Innovation Score?

LT Materials Co., Ltd. has an Innovation Score of 49.3 out of 100 (top 15% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does LT Materials Co., Ltd. focus on?

LT Materials Co., Ltd.'s top technology area is H10K (Organic Electric Solid-state Devices) with 44 patents, ranking #79 of 791 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 6 CPC subclasses total.

Is LT Materials Co., Ltd.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for LT Materials Co., Ltd..

What does claim depth mean for LT Materials Co., Ltd.'s patents?

LT Materials Co., Ltd.'s patents average 12.5 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the LT Materials Co., Ltd. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

LT Materials Co., Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 44 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H10K (Organic Electric Solid-state Devices).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, LT ranks #7,434 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 44 patents across 6 technology areas.

#7,434
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 15%
by Innovation Score (49.3/100): 12.5
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R7434 · Foreign Corporation #7,434 · 44 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-SMALL 44 grants
UPPER-Q #7,434/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Kpmg LLP
CPC-NARROW H10K · 6 areas
INNOV-PAR 49.3/100
CLAIMS-RICH 12.5 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
SPAN-YRS 2020–2025 · 6y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Kpmg LLP (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How LT’s 49.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 13.1 pts (27%) Velocity 20.0 pts (41%) Breadth 8.7 pts (18%) Claim depth 7.5 pts (15%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
JD com American · near

49
LT Materials · this assignee

49
OpenAI OpCo · near

49
Sofec · near

49
Interaxon · near

49
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows LT's Innovation Score is 49.3/100 (top 15% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for LT?

Each dot is one of LT’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). LT’s own 12.5 claims/patent is at or below the 18.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

LT vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where LT's grants concentrate

LT Materials Co., Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under H10K (Organic Electric Solid-state Devices). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (12 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2020. By volume, LT sits between Kpmg LLP and Mega Brands Inc..

LT's three-year grant acceleration

LT Materials Co., Ltd. shows 31 grants in 2022–2024 against only 5 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Kpmg LLP

44
Kulzer

44
Labcyte

44
Lancium

44
Leo Pharma A/S

44
Lucomm

44
Lunatech

44
Mega Brands

44
LT Materials ◀

44

What this shows LT holds 44 patents at rank #7,433, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near LT

By rank, the assignees closest to #7,433 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H10K (Organic Electric Solid-state Devices)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in LT's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for LT, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In H10K (Organic Electric Solid-state Devices), LT ranks #79 of 791 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (49 here).

JD.com American Technologies Corporation 49 Sofec, Inc. 49 OpenAI OpCo, LLC 49 Interaxon Inc. 49

LT's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

49 Top 15% higher than 85% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2020–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

LT Materials Co., Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2020	2	4.5%
2021	3	6.8%
2022	12	27.3%
2023	8	18.2%
2024	11	25.0%
2025partial year	8	18.2%

Which technologies does LT Materials Co., Ltd. patent most?

H10K - Organic Electric Solid-state Devices 44

C07D - Heterocyclic Compounds 42

C09K - Materials FOR Miscellaneous Applications, NOT Provided FOR Elsewhere 26

C07F - Acyclic, Carbocyclic OR Heterocyclic Compounds Containing Elements Other Than Carbon, Hydrogen, Halogen, Oxygen, Nitrogen, Sulfur, Selenium OR Tellurium 19

Y02E - Reduction OF Greenhouse GAS [GHG] Emissions, Related TO Energy Generation, Transmission OR Distribution 3

C09B - Organic Dyes OR Closely-related Compounds FOR Producing Dyes ; , e.g. PIGMENTS; MORDANTS; Lakes 1

Top 6 of 6 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

LT Materials Co., Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

LT Materials Co., Ltd.'s lead technology class is H10K (Organic Electric Solid-state Devices), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H10K
Ranked #7,434 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare LT Materials Co., Ltd. against Kpmg LLP, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 49.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.