Kulzer GMBH
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 44 granted patents across 29 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61C (DENTISTRY; Apparatus OR Methods FOR Oral OR Dental Hygiene).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Kulzer ranks #7,430 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 44 patents across 29 technology areas.
- #7,430
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 9%
- by Innovation Score (53.1/100)
- 17.4
- avg claims per patent
- +182%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R7430 · Foreign Corporation #7,430 · 44 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-SMALL 44 grants
- UPPER-Q #7,430/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Ixblue
- CPC-FOCUS A61C · 29 areas
- INNOV-PAR 53.1/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 17.4 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-SURGE +182% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Ixblue (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Kulzer’s 53.1 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Kulzer
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Amada · near
Amada · near
53 score
- Kulzer · this assignee
Kulzer · this assignee
53 score
- Topgolf International · near
Topgolf International · near
53 score
- Inveniam Capital… · near
Inveniam Capital… · near
53 score
- OMG · near
OMG · near
53 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Kulzer's Innovation Score is 53.1/100 (top 9% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Kulzer?
Each dot is one of Kulzer’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Kulzer’s own 17.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Kulzer's grants concentrate
Kulzer GMBH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 29 CPC subclasses with 79.5% of grants classified under A61C (DENTISTRY; Apparatus OR Methods FOR Oral OR Dental Hygiene). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (10 grants) versus a trough of 4 in 2021. By volume, Kulzer sits between Ixblue and Leo Pharma A/S.
Kulzer's three-year grant acceleration
Kulzer GMBH shows 22 grants in 2022–2024 against only 14 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Kulzer's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Ixblue
Ixblue
44 patents
- K-international
K-International, Inc.
44 patents
- Kenwood
Kenwood Limited
44 patents
- Kpmg LLP
Kpmg LLP
44 patents
- Labcyte
Labcyte Inc.
44 patents
- Lancium
Lancium LLC
44 patents
- LT Materials
LT Materials Co., Ltd.
44 patents
- Leo Pharma A/S
Leo Pharma A/S
44 patents
- Kulzer ◀
Kulzer GMBH
44 patents
What this shows Kulzer holds 44 patents at rank #7,430, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Kulzer
By rank, the assignees closest to #7,430 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in A61C (Dentistry)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Kulzer's primary technology class.
Assignees with similar portfolio profiles
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Kulzer, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A61C (Dentistry), Kulzer ranks #26 of 546 assignees by patent count in that subclass.
Similar innovation score
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (53 here).
Kulzer's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
53 Top 9% higher than 91% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 6 | 13.6% |
| 2019 | 5 | 11.4% |
| 2020 | 5 | 11.4% |
| 2021 | 4 | 9.1% |
| 2022 | 10 | 22.7% |
| 2023 | 6 | 13.6% |
| 2024 | 6 | 13.6% |
| 2025partial year | 2 | 4.5% |
Which technologies does Kulzer GMBH patent most?
Top 15 of 29 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Kulzer GMBH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Kulzer GMBH's lead technology class is A61C (DENTISTRY; Apparatus OR Methods FOR Oral OR Dental Hygiene), 79.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61C
- Ranked #7,430 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Kulzer GMBH against Ixblue, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 53.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.