Mega Brands Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 44 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A63H (Toys, e.g. Tops, Dolls, Hoops OR Building Blocks).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Mega ranks #7,439 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 44 patents across 3 technology areas.
- #7,439
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 8th percentile
- by Innovation Score (21.4/100)
- 3.6
- avg claims per patent
- -95%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R7439 · Foreign Corporation #7,439 · 44 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-SMALL 44 grants
- UPPER-Q #7,439/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Leo Pharma A/S
- CPC-NARROW A63H · 3 areas
- INNOV-THIN 21.4/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 3.6 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -95% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Leo Pharma A/S (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Mega’s 21.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Mega
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Mega Brands · this assignee 21
Mega Brands · this assignee
21 score
- OA Defense · near 21
OA Defense · near
21 score
- Streamwide · near 21
Streamwide · near
21 score
- Kirio · near 21
Kirio · near
21 score
- Elago · near 21
Elago · near
21 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Mega's Innovation Score is 21.4/100 (8th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Mega?
Each dot is one of Mega’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Mega’s own 3.6 claims/patent is at or below the 18.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Mega's grants concentrate
Mega Brands Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 13.6% of grants classified under A63H (Toys, e.g. Tops, Dolls, Hoops OR Building Blocks). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (16 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2020. By volume, Mega sits between LT Materials Co., Ltd. and Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, LLC.
Who files at Mega's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- LT Materials
LT Materials Co., Ltd.
44 patents
- Leo Pharma A/S
Leo Pharma A/S
44 patents
- Lucomm
Lucomm Technologies, Inc.
44 patents
- Lunatech
Lunatech, LLC
44 patents
- MIE University
MIE University
44 patents
- Mjnn
Mjnn LLC
44 patents
- Mainspring Energy
Mainspring Energy, Inc.
44 patents
- Medical Diagnosti…
Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, LLC
44 patents
- Mega Brands ◀
Mega Brands Inc.
44 patents
What this shows Mega holds 44 patents at rank #7,437, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Mega
By rank, the assignees closest to #7,437 in granted patent volume.
- LT Materials Co., Ltd. #7,433 · 44 patents
- Leo Pharma A/S #7,434 · 44 patents
- Lucomm Technologies, Inc. #7,435 · 44 patents
- Lunatech, LLC #7,436 · 44 patents
- MIE University #7,438 · 44 patents
- Mjnn LLC #7,439 · 44 patents
- Mainspring Energy, Inc. #7,440 · 44 patents
- Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, LLC #7,441 · 44 patents
Leaders in A63H (Toys)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Mega's primary technology class.
Assignees with similar portfolio profiles
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Mega, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A63H (Toys), Mega ranks #54 of 312 assignees by patent count in that subclass.
Similar innovation score
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (21 here).
Mega's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
21 8th percentile higher than 8% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 4 | 9.1% |
| 2016 | 12 | 27.3% |
| 2017 | 16 | 36.4% |
| 2018 | 5 | 11.4% |
| 2019 | 5 | 11.4% |
| 2020 | 2 | 4.5% |
Which technologies does Mega Brands Inc. patent most?
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Mega Brands Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Mega Brands Inc.'s lead technology class is A63H (Toys, e.g. Tops, Dolls, Hoops OR Building Blocks), 13.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A63H
- Ranked #7,439 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Mega Brands Inc. against LT Materials Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 21.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.