Overall rank by patents
#3,600
of 49,997 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 102 granted patents across 13 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C07K (Peptides).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Kymab ranks #3,600 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 102 patents across 13 technology areas.
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R3600 · Foreign Corporation #3,600 · 102 grants
GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL
Nearest grant-volume peer: H.C. Starck Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
Cardiovalve · near
50 score
Centripetal Networks · near
50 score
Kymab · this assignee
50 score
National Products · near
50 score
REIFENHÄUSER & KG… · near
50 score
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Kymab's Innovation Score is 50.0/100 (top 14% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Kymab Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 13 CPC subclasses with 97.1% of grants classified under C07K (Peptides). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (23 grants) versus a trough of 3 in 2021. By volume, Kymab sits between H.C. Starck Inc. and Peking University Founder Group Co., Ltd..
Kymab Limited shows 25 grants in 2022–2024 against only 19 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
H.C. Starck Inc.
102 patents
Inficon AG
102 patents
Infineum International Limited
102 patents
Kakao Corp.
102 patents
Mellanox Technologies TLV Ltd.
102 patents
Nisshin Steel Co., Ltd.
102 patents
Ormco Corporation
102 patents
Peking University Founder Group Co., Ltd.
102 patents
Kymab Limited
102 patents
What this shows Kymab holds 102 patents at rank #3,600, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #3,600 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Kymab's primary technology class.
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Kymab, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (50 here).
Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (20.8 here).
Kymab's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
50 Top 14% higher than 86% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 23 | 22.5% |
| 2016 | 15 | 14.7% |
| 2017 | 6 | 5.9% |
| 2018 | 11 | 10.8% |
| 2019 | 5 | 4.9% |
| 2020 | 11 | 10.8% |
| 2021 | 3 | 2.9% |
| 2022 | 7 | 6.9% |
| 2023 | 12 | 11.8% |
| 2024 | 6 | 5.9% |
| 2025partial year | 3 | 2.9% |
Top 13 of 13 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#3,600
of 49,997 tracked assignees
50.0 out of 100
What to do with this data
Kymab Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.