Where does Kurt J. Lesker Company rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Kurt J. Lesker Company ranks #48,249 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Kurt J. Lesker Company hold?

Kurt J. Lesker Company holds 5 US utility patents granted between 2017 and 2025, spanning 4 technology areas.

What is Kurt J. Lesker Company's Innovation Score?

Kurt J. Lesker Company has an Innovation Score of 30.1 out of 100 (33rd percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Kurt J. Lesker Company focus on?

Kurt J. Lesker Company's top technology area is H01J (Electric Discharge Tubes OR Discharge Lamps) with 5 patents, ranking #328 of 1,076 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 4 CPC subclasses total.

Is Kurt J. Lesker Company's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Kurt J. Lesker Company's recent grant velocity is -67% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Kurt J. Lesker Company's patents?

Kurt J. Lesker Company's patents average 17.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Kurt J. Lesker Company patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Kurt J. Lesker Company

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H01J (Electric Discharge Tubes OR Discharge Lamps).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Kurt ranks #48,249 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 4 technology areas.

#48,249
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 33rd percentile
by Innovation Score (30.1/100): 17.0
avg claims per patent: -67%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R48249 · US Corporation #48,249 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
BOTTOM-DECILE #48,249/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Kripya
CPC-NARROW H01J · 4 areas
INNOV-THIN 30.1/100
CLAIMS-RICH 17.0 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -67% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Kripya LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Kurt’s 30.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.2 pts (21%) Velocity 6.7 pts (22%) Breadth 7.1 pts (24%) Claim depth 10.2 pts (34%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Kurt J Lesker · this assignee

30
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Kurt's Innovation Score is 30.1/100 (33rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Kurt?

Each dot is one of Kurt’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Kurt’s own 17.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Kurt vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Kurt's grants concentrate

Kurt J. Lesker Company is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under H01J (Electric Discharge Tubes OR Discharge Lamps). By volume, Kurt sits between Kripya LLC and L'Isolante K-Flex S.p.A..

Kurt's three-year grant acceleration

Kurt J. Lesker Company shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Kripya

5
Kueper & KG

5
Kuleon

5
Kundel Industries

5
Kverneland Group…

5
Kwikbolt

5
L&M Architectural…

5
L'isolante K-flex…

5
Kurt J Lesker ◀

5

What this shows Kurt holds 5 patents at rank #48,265, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Kurt

By rank, the assignees closest to #48,265 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H01J (Electric Discharge Tubes OR Discharge Lamps)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Kurt's primary technology class.

Kurt's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

30 33rd percentile higher than 33% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Kurt J. Lesker Company patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2017	1	20.0%
2018	1	20.0%
2019	1	20.0%
2023	1	20.0%
2025partial year	1	20.0%

Which technologies does Kurt J. Lesker Company patent most?

H01J - Electric Discharge Tubes OR Discharge Lamps 5

C23C - Coating Metallic MATERIAL; Coating Material With Metallic MATERIAL; Surface Treatment OF Metallic Material BY Diffusion Into THE Surface, BY Chemical Conversion OR SUBSTITUTION; Coating BY Vacuum Evaporation, BY Sputtering, BY ION Implantation OR BY Chemical Vapour Deposition, IN General 4

H10N - Electric Solid-state Devices NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 1

H01L - Semiconductor Devices NOT Covered BY Class H10 1

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Kurt J. Lesker Company's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Kurt J. Lesker Company's lead technology class is H01J (Electric Discharge Tubes OR Discharge Lamps), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H01J
Ranked #48,249 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Kurt J. Lesker Company against Kripya LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 30.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.