PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Kverneland Group Nieuw-Vennep B.V.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2022–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A01C (PLANTING; SOWING; Fertilising).

RSS updates for this company
Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Kverneland ranks #48,250 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 5 technology areas.

#48,250
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 49%
by Innovation Score (35.6/100)
13.6
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R48250 · Foreign Corporation #48,250 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

  • GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
  • BOTTOM-DECILE #48,250/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Kueper & KG
  • CPC-NARROW A01C · 5 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 35.6/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 13.6 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • SPAN-YRS 2022–2025 · 4y
  • BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Kueper GmbH & Co. KG (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Kverneland’s 35.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Kverneland

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Kverneland's Innovation Score is 35.6/100 (top 49% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Kverneland?

Each dot is one of Kverneland’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Kverneland’s own 13.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Kverneland vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 4.95.05.055.05.05.1 5101520253035 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Kueper GmbH & Co. KG - 5, 8.8Kueper & KGKuleon, LLC - 5, 29.2KuleonKundel Industries, Inc. - 5, 16.4Kundel IndustriesKurt J. Lesker Company - 5, 17Kurt J LeskerKwikbolt Limited - 5, 12KwikboltL&M Architectural Graphics, Inc. - 5, 20.2L&M Architectural…L'Isolante K-Flex S.p.A. - 5, 10L'isolante K-flex…L-base Co., Ltd. - 5, 8.8L-baseKverneland Group Nieuw-Vennep B.V. - 5, 13.6Kverneland Group…
Kverneland vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Kverneland's grants concentrate

Kverneland Group Nieuw-Vennep B.V. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 60% of grants classified under A01C (PLANTING; SOWING; Fertilising). By volume, Kverneland sits between Kueper GmbH & Co. KG and L-base Co., Ltd..

Kverneland's three-year grant acceleration

Kverneland Group Nieuw-Vennep B.V. shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Kverneland's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Kverneland holds 5 patents at rank #48,266, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Kverneland

By rank, the assignees closest to #48,266 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A01C (Planting)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Kverneland's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Kverneland, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A01C (Planting), Kverneland ranks #107 of 276 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (36 here).

Tempo Industries, LLC 36 EnGeneIC Molecular Delivery Pty Ltd 36 Oase GmbH 36 Acorn Technologies, Inc. 36

Kverneland's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

36 Top 49% higher than 51% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0.511.522.533.5 202220232025 3
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2022–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2022–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Kverneland Group Nieuw-Vennep B.V. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2022 1 20.0%
2023 1 20.0%
2025partial year 3 60.0%

Which technologies does Kverneland Group Nieuw-Vennep B.V. patent most?

Top 5 of 5 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Kverneland Group Nieuw-Vennep B.V.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Kverneland Group Nieuw-Vennep B.V.'s lead technology class is A01C (PLANTING; SOWING; Fertilising), 60% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A01C
  • Ranked #48,250 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Kverneland Group Nieuw-Vennep B.V. against Kueper GmbH & Co. KG, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 35.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.