Overall rank by patents
#24,610
of 50,000 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61H (PHYSICAL THERAPY APPARATUS, e.g. DEVICES FOR LOCATING OR STIMULATING REFLEX POINTS IN THE BODY; ARTIFICIAL RESPIRATION; MASSAGE; BATHING DEVICES FOR SPECIAL THERAPEUTIC OR HYGIENIC PURPOSES OR SPECIFI).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Jiangsu ranks #24,610 of 50,000 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 11 patents across 5 technology areas.
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R24610 · Foreign Corporation #24,610 · 11 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
Nearest grant-volume peer: Jay R. Smith Mfg. Co. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
Jiangsu Alphay Medic… · this assignee
40 score
3D Lighting Innovati… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Jiangsu's Innovation Score is 39.6/100 (top 38% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Jiangsu Alphay Medical Device Co., Ltd is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 18.2% of grants classified under A61H (PHYSICAL THERAPY APPARATUS, e.g. DEVICES FOR LOCATING OR STIMULATING REFLEX POINTS IN THE BODY; ARTIFICIAL RESPIRATION; MASSAGE; BATHING DEVICES FOR SPECIAL THERAPEUTIC OR HYGIENIC PURPOSES OR SPECIFI). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Jiangsu sits between Jay R. Smith Mfg. Co. and Joint-stock Company “transneft Siberia”.
Jiangsu Alphay Medical Device Co., Ltd shows 6 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Jay R. Smith Mfg. Co.
11 patents
Jeanologia, S. L.
11 patents
JenKem Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing)
11 patents
Jewelry IP, LLC
11 patents
JimmyAsh LLC
11 patents
Joh. Friedrich Behrens AG
11 patents
Johnson Controls-Hitachi Air Conditioning Technology (Hong Kong) Limited
11 patents
Joint-Stock Company “Transneft Siberia”
11 patents
Jiangsu Alphay Medical Device Co., Ltd
11 patents
What this shows Jiangsu holds 11 patents at rank #24,605, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #24,605 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Jiangsu's primary technology class.
Jiangsu's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
40 Top 38% higher than 62% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2021 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2022 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2023 | 3 | 27.3% |
| 2024 | 2 | 18.2% |
| 2025partial year | 3 | 27.3% |
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#24,610
of 50,000 tracked assignees
39.6 out of 100
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.