Jay R. Smith Mfg. Co.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E03F (SEWERS; Cesspools).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Jay ranks #24,600 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 11 patents across 8 technology areas.
- #24,600
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 16th percentile
- by Innovation Score (25.1/100)
- 10.9
- avg claims per patent
- -90%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R24600 · US Corporation #24,600 · 11 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 11 grants
- MID-PACK #24,600/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Janssen R & D Ireland
- CPC-NARROW E03F · 8 areas
- INNOV-THIN 25.1/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 10.9 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -90% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Janssen R & D Ireland (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Jay’s 25.1 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Jay
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Jay R Smith Mfg · this assignee 25
Jay R Smith Mfg · this assignee
25 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Jay's Innovation Score is 25.1/100 (16th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Jay?
Each dot is one of Jay’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Jay’s own 10.9 claims/patent is ABOVE the 10.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Jay's grants concentrate
Jay R. Smith Mfg. Co. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 63.6% of grants classified under E03F (SEWERS; Cesspools). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Jay sits between JKH Health Co., Ltd. and Jiangsu Alphay Medical Device Co., Ltd.
Who files at Jay's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- JKH Health
JKH Health Co., Ltd.
11 patents
- Joyetech (Changzh…
Joyetech (CHANGZHOU) Electronics Co., Ltd.
11 patents
- Justoy PTY
Justoy PTY Limited
11 patents
- Janssen R & D Ire…
Janssen R & D Ireland
11 patents
- Jeanologia S L
Jeanologia, S. L.
11 patents
- Jenkem Technology…
JenKem Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing)
11 patents
- Jewelry IP
Jewelry IP, LLC
11 patents
- Jiangsu Alphay Me…
Jiangsu Alphay Medical Device Co., Ltd
11 patents
- Jay R Smith Mfg ◀
Jay R. Smith Mfg. Co.
11 patents
What this shows Jay holds 11 patents at rank #24,601, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Jay
By rank, the assignees closest to #24,601 in granted patent volume.
- JKH Health Co., Ltd. #24,597 · 11 patents
- Joyetech (CHANGZHOU) Electronics Co., Ltd. #24,598 · 11 patents
- Justoy PTY Limited #24,599 · 11 patents
- Janssen R & D Ireland #24,600 · 11 patents
- Jeanologia, S. L. #24,602 · 11 patents
- JenKem Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing) #24,603 · 11 patents
- Jewelry IP, LLC #24,604 · 11 patents
- Jiangsu Alphay Medical Device Co., Ltd #24,605 · 11 patents
Leaders in E03F (Sewers)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Jay's primary technology class.
- MAG Aerospace Industries, LLC 26 in class
- Zurn Industries, LLC 25 in class
- Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. 25 in class
- BIO Clean Environmental Services, LLC 22 in class
- SeeScan, Inc. 21 in class
- Ridge Tool Company 18 in class
- Thermaco Incorporated 17 in class
- Infiltrator Water Technologies, LLC 15 in class
Jay's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
25 16th percentile higher than 16% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2016 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2017 | 2 | 18.2% |
| 2018 | 3 | 27.3% |
| 2019 | 3 | 27.3% |
| 2021 | 1 | 9.1% |
Which technologies does Jay R. Smith Mfg. Co. patent most?
Top 8 of 8 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Jay R. Smith Mfg. Co.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Jay R. Smith Mfg. Co.'s lead technology class is E03F (SEWERS; Cesspools), 63.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore E03F
- Ranked #24,600 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Jay R. Smith Mfg. Co. against JKH Health Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 25.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.