Where does Jenkins Asia Tech Shanghai Limited rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Jenkins Asia Tech Shanghai Limited ranks #41,095 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Jenkins Asia Tech Shanghai Limited hold?

Jenkins Asia Tech Shanghai Limited holds 6 US utility patents granted between 2017 and 2019, spanning 3 technology areas.

What is Jenkins Asia Tech Shanghai Limited's Innovation Score?

Jenkins Asia Tech Shanghai Limited has an Innovation Score of 21.8 out of 100 (9th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Jenkins Asia Tech Shanghai Limited's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Jenkins Asia Tech Shanghai Limited's recent grant velocity is -100% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Jenkins Asia Tech Shanghai Limited's patents?

Jenkins Asia Tech Shanghai Limited's patents average 14.8 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Jenkins Asia Tech Shanghai Limited patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Jenkins Asia Tech Shanghai Limited

Q: What technology areas does Jenkins Asia Tech Shanghai Limited focus on?

Jenkins Asia Tech Shanghai Limited's top technology area is A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment) with 5 patents, ranking #277 of 1,021 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 3 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Jenkins ranks #41,095 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 3 technology areas.

#41,095
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 9th percentile
by Innovation Score (21.8/100): 14.8
avg claims per patent: -100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R41095 · Foreign Corporation #41,095 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
LOWER-Q #41,095/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Japan System Planning
CPC-NARROW A63B · 3 areas
INNOV-THIN 21.8/100
CLAIMS-RICH 14.8 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DROP -100% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Japan System Planning Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Jenkins’s 21.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.7 pts (31%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 6.1 pts (28%) Claim depth 8.9 pts (41%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Jenkins Asia Tech… · this assignee

22
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Jenkins's Innovation Score is 21.8/100 (9th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Jenkins?

Each dot is one of Jenkins’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Jenkins’s own 14.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 5.3 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Jenkins vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Jenkins's grants concentrate

Jenkins Asia Tech Shanghai Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 83.3% of grants classified under A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Jenkins sits between Japan System Planning Co., Ltd. and JetBed, Inc..

Japan System Plan…

6
Jarder Outdoor Ni…

6
Jasmin Larian

6
Jelmar

6
Jenny's Rose

6
Jensen Enterprises

6
Jerome Canady Res…

6
Jetbed

6
Jenkins Asia Tech… ◀

6

What this shows Jenkins holds 6 patents at rank #41,103, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Jenkins

By rank, the assignees closest to #41,103 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Jenkins's primary technology class.

Jenkins's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

22 9th percentile higher than 9% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2019

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Jenkins Asia Tech Shanghai Limited patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2017	2	33.3%
2018	1	16.7%
2019	3	50.0%

Which technologies does Jenkins Asia Tech Shanghai Limited patent most?

A63B - Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment 5

A61B - DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification 1

A61H - Physical Therapy Apparatus, e.g. Devices FOR Locating OR Stimulating Reflex Points IN THE BODY; Artificial RESPIRATION; MASSAGE; Bathing Devices FOR Special Therapeutic OR Hygienic Purposes OR Specific Parts OF THE Body 1

Top 3 of 3 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Jenkins Asia Tech Shanghai Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Jenkins Asia Tech Shanghai Limited's lead technology class is A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment), 83.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A63B
Ranked #41,095 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Jenkins Asia Tech Shanghai Limited against Japan System Planning Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 21.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.