Jelmar, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C11D (Detergent COMPOSITIONS; USE OF Single Substances AS DETERGENTS; Soap OR SOAP-MAKING; Resin SOAPS; Recovery OF Glycerol).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Jelmar ranks #41,093 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 2 technology areas.
- #41,093
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 10th percentile
- by Innovation Score (22.2/100)
- 17.5
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R41093 · US Corporation #41,093 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #41,093/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Japan Steel Works M&E
- CPC-NARROW C11D · 2 areas
- INNOV-THIN 22.2/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 17.5 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Japan Steel Works M&E, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Jelmar’s 22.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Jelmar
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Jelmar · this assignee 22
Jelmar · this assignee
22 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Jelmar's Innovation Score is 22.2/100 (10th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Jelmar?
Each dot is one of Jelmar’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Jelmar’s own 17.5 claims/patent is ABOVE the 7.7 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Jelmar's grants concentrate
Jelmar, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under C11D (Detergent COMPOSITIONS; USE OF Single Substances AS DETERGENTS; Soap OR SOAP-MAKING; Resin SOAPS; Recovery OF Glycerol). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Jelmar sits between Japan Steel Works M&E, Inc. and Jerome Canady Research Institute for Advanced Biological and Technological Sciences.
Who files at Jelmar's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Japan Steel Works…
Japan Steel Works M&E, Inc.
6 patents
- Japan System Plan…
Japan System Planning Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- Jarder Outdoor Ni…
Jarder Outdoor Ningbo Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- Jasmin Larian
Jasmin Larian LLC
6 patents
- Jenkins Asia Tech…
Jenkins Asia Tech Shanghai Limited
6 patents
- Jenny's Rose
Jenny's Rose, LLC
6 patents
- Jensen Enterprises
Jensen Enterprises, Inc.
6 patents
- Jerome Canady Res…
Jerome Canady Research Institute for Advanced Biological and Technological Sciences
6 patents
- Jelmar ◀
Jelmar, LLC
6 patents
What this shows Jelmar holds 6 patents at rank #41,102, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Jelmar
By rank, the assignees closest to #41,102 in granted patent volume.
- Japan Steel Works M&E, Inc. #41,098 · 6 patents
- Japan System Planning Co., Ltd. #41,099 · 6 patents
- Jarder Outdoor Ningbo Co., Ltd. #41,100 · 6 patents
- Jasmin Larian LLC #41,101 · 6 patents
- Jenkins Asia Tech Shanghai Limited #41,103 · 6 patents
- Jenny's Rose, LLC #41,104 · 6 patents
- Jensen Enterprises, Inc. #41,105 · 6 patents
- Jerome Canady Research Institute for Advanced Biological and Technological Sciences #41,106 · 6 patents
Leaders in C11D (Detergent Compositions)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Jelmar's primary technology class.
Jelmar's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
22 10th percentile higher than 10% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 3 | 50.0% |
| 2018 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2019 | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does Jelmar, LLC patent most?
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Jelmar, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Jelmar, LLC's lead technology class is C11D (Detergent COMPOSITIONS; USE OF Single Substances AS DETERGENTS; Soap OR SOAP-MAKING; Resin SOAPS; Recovery OF Glycerol), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C11D
- Ranked #41,093 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Jelmar, LLC against Japan Steel Works M&E, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 22.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.