Jasmin Larian LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Jasmin ranks #41,083 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 0 technology areas.
- #41,083
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 0th percentile
- by Innovation Score (7.3/100)
- 1.0
- avg claims per patent
- -80%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R41083 · US Corporation #41,083 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #41,083/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Japan Health…
- CPC-UNK CPC blank
- INNOV-LOW 7.3/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -80% vel
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Japan Health Sciences Foundation (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Jasmin’s 7.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Jasmin
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Jasmin Larian · this assignee 7
Jasmin Larian · this assignee
7 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Jasmin's Innovation Score is 7.3/100 (0th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Jasmin?
Each dot is one of Jasmin’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Jasmin’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 8.8 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Jasmin's grants concentrate
Jasmin Larian LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2018 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, Jasmin sits between Japan Health Sciences Foundation and Jensen Enterprises, Inc..
Who files at Jasmin's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Japan Health Scie…
Japan Health Sciences Foundation
6 patents
- Japan Steel Works…
Japan Steel Works M&E, Inc.
6 patents
- Japan System Plan…
Japan System Planning Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- Jarder Outdoor Ni…
Jarder Outdoor Ningbo Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- Jelmar
Jelmar, LLC
6 patents
- Jenkins Asia Tech…
Jenkins Asia Tech Shanghai Limited
6 patents
- Jenny's Rose
Jenny's Rose, LLC
6 patents
- Jensen Enterprises
Jensen Enterprises, Inc.
6 patents
- Jasmin Larian ◀
Jasmin Larian LLC
6 patents
What this shows Jasmin holds 6 patents at rank #41,101, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Jasmin
By rank, the assignees closest to #41,101 in granted patent volume.
- Japan Health Sciences Foundation #41,097 · 6 patents
- Japan Steel Works M&E, Inc. #41,098 · 6 patents
- Japan System Planning Co., Ltd. #41,099 · 6 patents
- Jarder Outdoor Ningbo Co., Ltd. #41,100 · 6 patents
- Jelmar, LLC #41,102 · 6 patents
- Jenkins Asia Tech Shanghai Limited #41,103 · 6 patents
- Jenny's Rose, LLC #41,104 · 6 patents
- Jensen Enterprises, Inc. #41,105 · 6 patents
Jasmin's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
7 0th percentile higher than 0% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 3 | 50.0% |
| 2019 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2020 | 1 | 16.7% |
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Jasmin Larian LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Ranked #41,083 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Jasmin Larian LLC against Japan Health Sciences Foundation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 7.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.