Overall rank by patents
#26,613
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 7 technology areas, active 2023–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: B60W (CONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE).
The verdict
J-quad holds 10 US patents across 7 technology areas, rank #26,613 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
J-quad Dynamics Inc. has been granted 10 US utility patents between 2023 and 2025, placing J-quad Dynamics Inc. at rank #26,613 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 7 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 7.2 claims per patent with primary concentration in B60W (CONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE). As a Foreign Corporation, J-quad Dynamics Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, J-quad sits between Iradimed Corporation (10 patents, rank #26,609) and JCU Corporation (10 patents, rank #26,617) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 42.0/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Historical data spans 2023 through 2025, with 10 total grants over that period. Velocity comparisons require five years of historical filings to calibrate. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. J-quad Dynamics Inc.'s 7.2 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while concentration in 7 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark J-quad Dynamics Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Iradimed Corporation
10 patents
Iron Mountain Incorporated
10 patents
Iwis antriebssysteme GmbH & Co. KG
10 patents
J & J SOLUTIONS, INC.
10 patents
JANESKO OY
10 patents
JBL RADICAL INNOVATIONS, LLC
10 patents
JBS USA, LLC
10 patents
JCU CORPORATION
10 patents
J-QUAD DYNAMICS INC.
10 patents
What this shows J-quad holds 10 patents at rank #26,613, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
J-quad's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
42 Top 32% higher than 68% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2023–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2024 | 4 | 40.0% |
| 2025 | 5 | 50.0% |
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#26,613
Across all tracked assignees
42.0 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
J-quad's 10 grants land it in the top 32% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.