IQX Corp.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2023–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04W (Wireless Communication Networks).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, IQX ranks #35,967 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 4 technology areas.
- #35,967
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 19%
- by Innovation Score (47.0/100)
- 21.3
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R35967 · US Corporation #35,967 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #35,967/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Ionic Solutions
- CPC-NARROW H04W · 4 areas
- INNOV-PAR 47.0/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 21.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- SPAN-YRS 2023–2025 · 3y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Ionic Solutions Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How IQX’s 47.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around IQX
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- IQX · this assignee
IQX · this assignee
47 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows IQX's Innovation Score is 47.0/100 (top 19% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for IQX?
Each dot is one of IQX’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). IQX’s own 21.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.3 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where IQX's grants concentrate
IQX Corp. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under H04W (Wireless Communication Networks). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2023. By volume, IQX sits between Ionic Solutions Ltd. and Ironclad, Inc..
IQX's three-year grant acceleration
IQX Corp. shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at IQX's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Ionic Solutions
Ionic Solutions Ltd.
7 patents
- Ioxt
Ioxt, LLC
7 patents
- IP Science
IP Science Limited
7 patents
- Ipco Germany
Ipco Germany GMBH
7 patents
- Iray Technology
Iray Technology Company Limited
7 patents
- Ircad
IRCAD
7 patents
- Iridium Medical T…
Iridium Medical Technology Co., Ltd.
7 patents
- Ironclad
Ironclad, Inc.
7 patents
- IQX ◀
IQX Corp.
7 patents
What this shows IQX holds 7 patents at rank #35,868, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near IQX
By rank, the assignees closest to #35,868 in granted patent volume.
- Ionic Solutions Ltd. #35,864 · 7 patents
- Ioxt, LLC #35,865 · 7 patents
- IP Science Limited #35,866 · 7 patents
- Ipco Germany GMBH #35,867 · 7 patents
- Iray Technology Company Limited #35,869 · 7 patents
- IRCAD #35,870 · 7 patents
- Iridium Medical Technology Co., Ltd. #35,871 · 7 patents
- Ironclad, Inc. #35,872 · 7 patents
Leaders in H04W (Wireless Communication Networks)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in IQX's primary technology class.
- Qualcomm Incorporated 17,987 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 11,683 in class
- LG Electronics Inc. 11,202 in class
- Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. 10,885 in class
- Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) 10,282 in class
- Apple Inc. 6,306 in class
- AT&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. 3,725 in class
- Intel Corporation 3,691 in class
IQX's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
47 Top 19% higher than 81% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2023–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2024 | 4 | 57.1% |
| 2025partial year | 2 | 28.6% |
Which technologies does IQX Corp. patent most?
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
IQX Corp.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- IQX Corp.'s lead technology class is H04W (Wireless Communication Networks), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04W
- Ranked #35,967 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare IQX Corp. against Ionic Solutions Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 47.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.