Ironclad, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2023–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Ironclad ranks #35,973 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 2 technology areas.
- #35,973
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 24%
- by Innovation Score (45.2/100)
- 21.7
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R35973 · US Corporation #35,973 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #35,973/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH IQX
- CPC-NARROW G06F · 2 areas
- INNOV-PAR 45.2/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 21.7 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- SPAN-YRS 2023–2025 · 3y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: IQX Corp. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Ironclad’s 45.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Ironclad
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Ironclad · this assignee
Ironclad · this assignee
45 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Ironclad's Innovation Score is 45.2/100 (top 24% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Ironclad?
Each dot is one of Ironclad’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Ironclad’s own 21.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.3 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Ironclad's grants concentrate
Ironclad, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 71.4% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (4 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2023. By volume, Ironclad sits between IQX Corp. and Ishikawa Energy Research Co., Ltd..
Ironclad's three-year grant acceleration
Ironclad, Inc. shows 6 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Ironclad's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- IQX
IQX Corp.
7 patents
- Iray Technology
Iray Technology Company Limited
7 patents
- Ircad
IRCAD
7 patents
- Iridium Medical T…
Iridium Medical Technology Co., Ltd.
7 patents
- IRP Nexus Group
IRP Nexus Group Ltd.
7 patents
- Isct
Isct LLC
7 patents
- Ishigaki
Ishigaki Company Limited
7 patents
- Ishikawa Energy R…
Ishikawa Energy Research Co., Ltd.
7 patents
- Ironclad ◀
Ironclad, Inc.
7 patents
What this shows Ironclad holds 7 patents at rank #35,872, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Ironclad
By rank, the assignees closest to #35,872 in granted patent volume.
- IQX Corp. #35,868 · 7 patents
- Iray Technology Company Limited #35,869 · 7 patents
- IRCAD #35,870 · 7 patents
- Iridium Medical Technology Co., Ltd. #35,871 · 7 patents
- IRP Nexus Group Ltd. #35,873 · 7 patents
- Isct LLC #35,874 · 7 patents
- Ishigaki Company Limited #35,875 · 7 patents
- Ishikawa Energy Research Co., Ltd. #35,876 · 7 patents
Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Ironclad's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 42,717 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 21,497 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 16,951 in class
- Google LLC 13,092 in class
- Intel Corporation 12,803 in class
- Apple Inc. 11,007 in class
- Amazon Technologies, Inc. 10,217 in class
- Dell Products L.P. 7,187 in class
Ironclad's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
45 Top 24% higher than 76% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2023–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2024 | 4 | 57.1% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 14.3% |
Which technologies does Ironclad, Inc. patent most?
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Ironclad, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Ironclad, Inc.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 71.4% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
- Ranked #35,973 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Ironclad, Inc. against IQX Corp., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 45.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.