IRCAD
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 1 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Ircad ranks #35,969 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 1 technology areas.
- #35,969
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 34th percentile
- by Innovation Score (30.2/100)
- 15.9
- avg claims per patent
- +400%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R35969 · Foreign Corporation #35,969 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #35,969/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH IP Science
- CPC-NARROW A61B · 1 areas
- INNOV-THIN 30.2/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 15.9 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-SURGE +400% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: IP Science Limited (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Ircad’s 30.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Ircad
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- IRCAD · this assignee 30
IRCAD · this assignee
30 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Ircad's Innovation Score is 30.2/100 (34th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Ircad?
Each dot is one of Ircad’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Ircad’s own 15.9 claims/patent is at or below the 16.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Ircad's grants concentrate
IRCAD is a focused PatentsView assignee: 1 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Ircad sits between IP Science Limited and Isct LLC.
Ircad's three-year grant acceleration
IRCAD shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at IRCAD's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- IP Science
IP Science Limited
7 patents
- Ipco Germany
Ipco Germany GMBH
7 patents
- IQX
IQX Corp.
7 patents
- Iray Technology
Iray Technology Company Limited
7 patents
- Iridium Medical T…
Iridium Medical Technology Co., Ltd.
7 patents
- Ironclad
Ironclad, Inc.
7 patents
- IRP Nexus Group
IRP Nexus Group Ltd.
7 patents
- Isct
Isct LLC
7 patents
- Ircad ◀
IRCAD
7 patents
What this shows IRCAD holds 7 patents at rank #35,870, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near IRCAD
By rank, the assignees closest to #35,870 in granted patent volume.
- IP Science Limited #35,866 · 7 patents
- Ipco Germany GMBH #35,867 · 7 patents
- IQX Corp. #35,868 · 7 patents
- Iray Technology Company Limited #35,869 · 7 patents
- Iridium Medical Technology Co., Ltd. #35,871 · 7 patents
- Ironclad, Inc. #35,872 · 7 patents
- IRP Nexus Group Ltd. #35,873 · 7 patents
- Isct LLC #35,874 · 7 patents
Leaders in A61B (Diagnosis)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in IRCAD's primary technology class.
- Covidien LP 5,709 in class
- Koniniklijke Philips N.V. 3,414 in class
- Olympus Corporation 2,758 in class
- Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. 2,362 in class
- Cilag GmbH International 2,063 in class
- Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. 1,921 in class
- DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. 1,796 in class
- Ethicon, Inc. 1,762 in class
Ircad's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
30 34th percentile higher than 34% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2020 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2022 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2024 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 14.3% |
Which technologies does IRCAD patent most?
Top 1 of 1 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
IRCAD's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- IRCAD's lead technology class is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61B
- Ranked #35,969 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare IRCAD against IP Science Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 30.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.