Ionic Solutions Ltd.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C02F (Treatment OF Water, Waste Water, Sewage, OR Sludge).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Ionic ranks #35,960 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 5 technology areas.
- #35,960
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 8th percentile
- by Innovation Score (20.9/100)
- 6.0
- avg claims per patent
- -60%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R35960 · US Corporation #35,960 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #35,960/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Investment Asset…
- CPC-NARROW C02F · 5 areas
- INNOV-THIN 20.9/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 6.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -60% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Investment Asset Holdings, LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Ionic’s 20.9 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Ionic
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Ionic Solutions · this assignee 21
Ionic Solutions · this assignee
21 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Ionic's Innovation Score is 20.9/100 (8th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Ionic?
Each dot is one of Ionic’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Ionic’s own 6.0 claims/patent is at or below the 19.1 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Ionic's grants concentrate
Ionic Solutions Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under C02F (Treatment OF Water, Waste Water, Sewage, OR Sludge). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Ionic sits between Investment Asset Holdings, LLC and IQX Corp..
Ionic's three-year grant acceleration
Ionic Solutions Ltd. shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Ionic's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Investment Asset…
Investment Asset Holdings, LLC
7 patents
- Invidx
Invidx Corp.
7 patents
- Invox Belgium
Invox Belgium NV
7 patents
- Iogenetics
Iogenetics, LLC
7 patents
- Ioxt
Ioxt, LLC
7 patents
- IP Science
IP Science Limited
7 patents
- Ipco Germany
Ipco Germany GMBH
7 patents
- IQX
IQX Corp.
7 patents
- Ionic Solutions ◀
Ionic Solutions Ltd.
7 patents
What this shows Ionic holds 7 patents at rank #35,864, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Ionic
By rank, the assignees closest to #35,864 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in C02F (Treatment OF Water)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Ionic's primary technology class.
- Ecolab USA Inc. 243 in class
- King Fahd University OF Petroleum AND Minerals 188 in class
- Evoqua Water Technologies LLC 177 in class
- Saudi Arabian OIL Company 147 in class
- Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies Support 82 in class
- Kurita Water Industries Ltd. 80 in class
- Nanjing University 75 in class
- Kemira OYJ 55 in class
Ionic's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
21 8th percentile higher than 8% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2017 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2019 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2020 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2023 | 1 | 14.3% |
Which technologies does Ionic Solutions Ltd. patent most?
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Ionic Solutions Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Ionic Solutions Ltd.'s lead technology class is C02F (Treatment OF Water, Waste Water, Sewage, OR Sludge), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C02F
- Ranked #35,960 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Ionic Solutions Ltd. against Investment Asset Holdings, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 20.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.