USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

IQM Finland OY

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 27 granted patents across 21 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2021–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H10N (ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR).

27
Total patents granted
21
CPC technology areas
15.0
Avg claims per patent
-
5-year grant velocity

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, IQM ranks #11,298 of 50,000 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 27 patents across 21 technology areas.

#11,298
of 50,000 US assignees by volume
Top 6%
by Innovation Score (56.7/100)
15.0
avg claims per patent

Portfolio overview

IQM Finland OY has been granted 27 US utility patents between 2021 and 2025, placing IQM Finland OY at #11,298 of 50,000 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 21 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 15.0 claims per patent with primary concentration in H10N (ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR). As a Foreign Corporation, IQM Finland OY is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, IQM sits between Intradin (shanghai) Machinery Co., Ltd. (27 patents, rank #11,287) and Intelligent Agricultural Solutions Llc (27 patents, rank #11,295) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 56.7/100 blends portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Grant cadence records the difference between two grant-year windows. Historical data spans 2021 through 2025, with 27 total grants over that period. Grant timing can lag the related application by years, so this comparison does not establish current R&D spending, strategic intent, or a company’s application activity. The Foreign Corporation classification provides context for the assignee record, not a conclusion about its business strategy.

Claim depth and technology breadth describe this aggregate record. IQM Finland OY's 15.0 average claims per patent is an average count, not a measure of claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk. The record spans 21 CPC subclasses. Combined with portfolio volume, these figures let readers compare the documented grant records of assignees in similar technology classes.

Who files at IQM's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows IQM holds 27 patents at rank #11,291, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near IQM

By rank, the assignees closest to #11,291 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H10N (Electric Solid-state Devices)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in IQM's primary technology class.

IQM's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

57 Top 6% higher than 94% of 50,000 US assignees

0–10: 687 US assignees (1%). Below this entry. 10–20: 2,527 US assignees (5%). Below this entry. 20–30: 13,162 US assignees (26%). Below this entry. 30–40: 15,294 US assignees (31%). Below this entry. 40–50: 11,491 US assignees (23%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,058 US assignees (10%). This entry sits in this band. 60–70: 1,537 US assignees (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 234 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 80–90: 10 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 90–100: 0 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

051015 20212022202320242025 6
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2021–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2021–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
IQM Finland OY patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2021 1 3.7%
2022 3 11.1%
2023 5 18.5%
2024 12 44.4%
2025partial year 6 22.2%

Grant record at a glance

Portfolio Volume 27 grants
CPC subclasses 21
Avg. claims / grant 15.0

Historical grant data only; it does not rate legal strength or current strategy.

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#11,298

of 50,000 tracked assignees

Innovation Score

56.7 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does IQM Finland OY rank among US patent assignees?
According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), IQM Finland OY ranks #11,298 of 50,000 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.
How many patents does IQM Finland OY hold?
IQM Finland OY holds 27 US utility patents granted between 2021 and 2025, spanning 21 technology areas.
What is IQM Finland OY's Innovation Score?
IQM Finland OY has an Innovation Score of 56.7 out of 100 (top 6% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).
What technology areas does IQM Finland OY focus on?
IQM Finland OY's top technology area is H10N (ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR) with 18 patents. Grants appear in 21 CPC subclasses total.
Is IQM Finland OY's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?
Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for IQM Finland OY.
What does claim depth mean for IQM Finland OY's patents?
IQM Finland OY's patents average 15.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.
How is the IQM Finland OY patent data sourced?
All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

How to use this portfolio

IQM's 27 grants land it in the top 6% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

  • Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance - IQM ranks #11,298 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
  • Most of this portfolio concentrates in H10N - see who else leads that technology area. H10N leaders
  • Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.