Where does IQM Finland OY rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), IQM Finland OY ranks #11,298 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does IQM Finland OY hold?

IQM Finland OY holds 27 US utility patents granted between 2021 and 2025, spanning 21 technology areas.

What is IQM Finland OY's Innovation Score?

IQM Finland OY has an Innovation Score of 56.7 out of 100 (top 6% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does IQM Finland OY focus on?

IQM Finland OY's top technology area is H10N (Electric Solid-state Devices NOT Otherwise Provided FOR) with 18 patents, ranking #114 of 891 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 21 CPC subclasses total.

Is IQM Finland OY's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for IQM Finland OY.

What does claim depth mean for IQM Finland OY's patents?

IQM Finland OY's patents average 15.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the IQM Finland OY patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

IQM Finland OY

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 27 granted patents across 21 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2021–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H10N (Electric Solid-state Devices NOT Otherwise Provided FOR).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, IQM ranks #11,298 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 27 patents across 21 technology areas.

#11,298
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 6%
by Innovation Score (56.7/100): 15.0
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R11298 · Foreign Corporation #11,298 · 27 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-SMALL 27 grants
UPPER-Q #11,298/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Industrial Revolution
CPC-FOCUS H10N · 21 areas
INNOV-PAR 56.7/100
CLAIMS-RICH 15.0 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
SPAN-YRS 2021–2025 · 5y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Industrial Revolution, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How IQM’s 56.7 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 11.5 pts (20%) Velocity 20.0 pts (35%) Breadth 16.2 pts (29%) Claim depth 9.0 pts (16%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Bosch Automotive… · near

57
Flir Unmanned… · near

57
IQM Finland OY · this assignee

57
Laird · near

57
Nano Dimension · near

57
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows IQM's Innovation Score is 56.7/100 (top 6% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for IQM?

Each dot is one of IQM’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). IQM’s own 15.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

IQM vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where IQM's grants concentrate

IQM Finland OY is a focused PatentsView assignee: 21 CPC subclasses with 66.7% of grants classified under H10N (Electric Solid-state Devices NOT Otherwise Provided FOR). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (12 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2021. By volume, IQM sits between Intradin (SHANGHAI) Machinery Co., Ltd. and Intelligent Agricultural Solutions LLC.

IQM's three-year grant acceleration

IQM Finland OY shows 20 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Intradin (Shangha…

27
Intrexon Actobiot…

27
Ipgoal Microelect…

27
IQE

27
Industrial Revolu…

27
Innovatech

27
Innovative Buildi…

27
Intelligent Agric…

27
IQM Finland OY ◀

27

What this shows IQM holds 27 patents at rank #11,291, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near IQM

By rank, the assignees closest to #11,291 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H10N (Electric Solid-state Devices)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in IQM's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for IQM, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In H10N (Electric Solid-state Devices), IQM ranks #114 of 891 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (57 here).

Nano Dimension Technologies, Ltd. 57 Flir Unmanned Aerial Systems ULC 57 Laird Technologies, Inc. 57 Bosch Automotive Service Solutions, Inc. 57

IQM's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

57 Top 6% higher than 94% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2021–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2021–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

IQM Finland OY patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2021	1	3.7%
2022	3	11.1%
2023	5	18.5%
2024	12	44.4%
2025partial year	6	22.2%

Which technologies does IQM Finland OY patent most?

H10N - Electric Solid-state Devices NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 18

G06N - Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models 15

H03K - Pulse Technique 10

H01L - Semiconductor Devices NOT Covered BY Class H10 9

H01P - WAVEGUIDES; Resonators, Lines, OR Other Devices OF THE Waveguide Type 6

B82Y - Specific Uses OR Applications OF NANOSTRUCTURES; Measurement OR Analysis OF NANOSTRUCTURES; Manufacture OR Treatment OF Nanostructures 4

H03H - Impedance Networks, e.g. Resonant CIRCUITS; Resonators 3

H03L - Automatic Control, Starting, Synchronisation OR Stabilisation OF Generators OF Electronic Oscillations OR Pulses 2

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 2

H05K - Printed CIRCUITS; Casings OR Constructional Details OF Electric APPARATUS; Manufacture OF Assemblages OF Electrical Components 2

G11C - Static Stores 1

G01R - Measuring Electric VARIABLES; Measuring Magnetic Variables 1

G01K - Measuring TEMPERATURE; Measuring Quantity OF HEAT; Thermally-sensitive Elements NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 1

G01J - Measurement OF Intensity, Velocity, Spectral Content, Polarisation, Phase OR Pulse Characteristics OF Infrared, Visible OR Ultraviolet LIGHT; COLORIMETRY; Radiation Pyrometry 1

H01B - CABLES; CONDUCTORS; INSULATORS; Selection OF Materials FOR Their Conductive, Insulating OR Dielectric Properties 1

Top 15 of 21 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

IQM Finland OY's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

IQM Finland OY's lead technology class is H10N (Electric Solid-state Devices NOT Otherwise Provided FOR), 66.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H10N
Ranked #11,298 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare IQM Finland OY against Intradin (SHANGHAI) Machinery Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 56.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.