Where does inMusic Brands, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), inMusic Brands, Inc. ranks #6,664 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does inMusic Brands, Inc. hold?

inMusic Brands, Inc. holds 50 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 15 technology areas.

What is inMusic Brands, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

inMusic Brands, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 38.3 out of 100 (top 41% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is inMusic Brands, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

inMusic Brands, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +94% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for inMusic Brands, Inc.'s patents?

inMusic Brands, Inc.'s patents average 12.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the inMusic Brands, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

inMusic Brands, Inc.

Q: What technology areas does inMusic Brands, Inc. focus on?

inMusic Brands, Inc.'s top technology area is G10H (Electrophonic Musical INSTRUMENTS; Instruments IN Which THE Tones ARE Generated BY Electromechanical Means OR Electronic Generators, OR IN Which THE Tones ARE Synthesised From A Data Store) with 29 patents, ranking #8 of 238 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 15 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 50 granted patents across 15 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G10H (Electrophonic Musical INSTRUMENTS; Instruments IN Which THE Tones ARE Generated BY Electromechanical Means OR Electronic Generators, OR IN Which THE Tones ARE Synthesised From A Data Store).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, inmusic ranks #6,664 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 50 patents across 15 technology areas.

#6,664
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 41%
by Innovation Score (38.3/100): 12.0
avg claims per patent: +94%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R6664 · US Corporation #6,664 · 50 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 50 grants
UPPER-Q #6,664/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH medmix Switzerland
CPC-FOCUS G10H · 15 areas
INNOV-THIN 38.3/100
CLAIMS-RICH 12.0 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +94% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: medmix Switzerland AG (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How inmusic’s 38.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 13.6 pts (36%) Velocity 3.8 pts (10%) Breadth 13.7 pts (36%) Claim depth 7.2 pts (19%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Cartier International · near

38
FibroGen · near

38
IGT Canada Solutions… · near

38
Improbable Worlds · near

38
inMusic Brands · this assignee

38
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows inmusic's Innovation Score is 38.3/100 (top 41% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for inmusic?

Each dot is one of inmusic’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). inmusic’s own 12.0 claims/patent is at or below the 14.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

inmusic vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where inmusic's grants concentrate

inMusic Brands, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 15 CPC subclasses with 58% of grants classified under G10H (Electrophonic Musical INSTRUMENTS; Instruments IN Which THE Tones ARE Generated BY Electromechanical Means OR Electronic Generators, OR IN Which THE Tones ARE Synthesised From A Data Store). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (13 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, inmusic sits between Withings and A.L.M.T. Corp..

inmusic's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, inMusic Brands, Inc. moved from 21 to 12 grants (0.57x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). See the growth leaderboard.

Withings

50
Wenzhou University

50
Weyerhaeuser NR

50
Wichita State Uni…

50
medmix Switzerland

50
varmour Networks

50
inmusic Brands ◀

50
4D Pharma Research

49
A L M T

49

What this shows inMusic holds 50 patents at rank #6,728, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near inMusic

By rank, the assignees closest to #6,728 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G10H (Electrophonic Musical Instruments)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in inMusic's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for inMusic, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G10H (Electrophonic Musical Instruments), inMusic ranks #8 of 238 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (38 here).

FibroGen, Inc. 38 IGT Canada Solutions ULC 38 Cartier International AG 38 Improbable Worlds Limited 38

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (12.0 here).

HLI Solutions, Inc. 12.0 avg Perfectvision Manufacturing, Inc. 12.0 avg Endress+Hauser SE+Co. KG 12.0 avg Nihon Kohden Corporation 12.0 avg

inmusic's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

38 Top 41% higher than 59% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

inMusic Brands, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	2.0%
2016	4	8.0%
2017	2	4.0%
2018	7	14.0%
2019	2	4.0%
2020	6	12.0%
2021	13	26.0%
2022	4	8.0%
2023	3	6.0%
2024	5	10.0%
2025partial year	3	6.0%

Which technologies does inMusic Brands, Inc. patent most?

G10H - Electrophonic Musical INSTRUMENTS; Instruments IN Which THE Tones ARE Generated BY Electromechanical Means OR Electronic Generators, OR IN Which THE Tones ARE Synthesised From A Data Store 29

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 21

G11B - Information Storage Based ON Relative Movement Between Record Carrier AND Transducer 15

G10L - Speech Analysis Techniques OR Speech SYNTHESIS; Speech RECOGNITION; Speech OR Voice Processing TECHNIQUES; Speech OR Audio Coding OR Decoding 10

H02J - Circuit Arrangements OR Systems FOR Supplying OR Distributing Electric POWER; Systems FOR Storing Electric Energy 10

G10D - Stringed Musical INSTRUMENTS; Wind Musical INSTRUMENTS; Accordions OR CONCERTINAS; Percussion Musical INSTRUMENTS; Aeolian HARPS; Singing-flame Musical INSTRUMENTS; Musical Instruments NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 7

G09G - Arrangements OR Circuits FOR Control OF Indicating Devices Using Static Means TO Present Variable Information 6

H04H - Broadcast Communication 2

H04R - Loudspeakers, Microphones, Gramophone Pick-ups OR Like Acoustic Electromechanical TRANSDUCERS; Deaf-aid SETS; Public Address Systems 2

H04S - Stereophonic Systems 1

F16D - Couplings FOR Transmitting ROTATION; CLUTCHES; Brakes 1

G01R - Measuring Electric VARIABLES; Measuring Magnetic Variables 1

H02K - Dynamo-electric Machines 1

B29C - Shaping OR Joining OF PLASTICS; Shaping OF Material IN A Plastic State, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; After-treatment OF THE Shaped Products, e.g. Repairing 1

H01H - Electric SWITCHES; RELAYS; SELECTORS; Emergency Protective Devices 1

Top 15 of 15 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

inMusic Brands, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

inMusic Brands, Inc.'s lead technology class is G10H (Electrophonic Musical INSTRUMENTS; Instruments IN Which THE Tones ARE Generated BY Electromechanical Means OR Electronic Generators, OR IN Which THE Tones ARE Synthesised From A Data Store), 58% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G10H
Ranked #6,664 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare inMusic Brands, Inc. against Withings, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 38.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.