Overall rank by patents
#32,057
of 49,997 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 12 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Inl—international ranks #32,057 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 12 technology areas.
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R32057 · Foreign Corporation #32,057 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
Nearest grant-volume peer: Information System Engineering Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
INL—International… · this assignee
32 score
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Inl—international's Innovation Score is 31.9/100 (39th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
INL—International Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory is a focused PatentsView assignee: 12 CPC subclasses with 50% of grants classified under G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2022. By volume, Inl—international sits between Information System Engineering Inc. and Innoaxis Co., Ltd.
INL—International Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 5 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Information System Engineering Inc.
8 patents
Ingine, Inc.
8 patents
Ingu Solutions Inc.
8 patents
Inka Entworks, Inc
8 patents
Inmar Supply Chain Solutions, LLC
8 patents
Innas BV
8 patents
Inno-spin LLC
8 patents
Innoaxis Co., Ltd
8 patents
INL—International Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory
8 patents
What this shows INL—International holds 8 patents at rank #32,015, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #32,015 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in INL—International's primary technology class.
Inl—international's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
32 39th percentile higher than 39% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 3 | 37.5% |
| 2020 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2022 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2024 | 2 | 25.0% |
Top 12 of 12 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#32,057
of 49,997 tracked assignees
31.9 out of 100
What to do with this data
INL—International Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.