Where does Industrial Bank OF Korea rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Industrial Bank OF Korea ranks #32,041 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Industrial Bank OF Korea hold?

Industrial Bank OF Korea holds 8 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2017, spanning 9 technology areas.

What is Industrial Bank OF Korea's Innovation Score?

Industrial Bank OF Korea has an Innovation Score of 24.6 out of 100 (15th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Industrial Bank OF Korea focus on?

Industrial Bank OF Korea's top technology area is G11C (Static Stores) with 4 patents, ranking #390 of 882 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 9 CPC subclasses total.

Is Industrial Bank OF Korea's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Industrial Bank OF Korea's recent grant velocity is -100% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Industrial Bank OF Korea's patents?

Industrial Bank OF Korea's patents average 10.8 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Industrial Bank OF Korea patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Industrial Bank OF Korea

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 9 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2017. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G11C (Static Stores).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Industrial ranks #32,041 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 9 technology areas.

#32,041
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 15th percentile
by Innovation Score (24.6/100): 10.8
avg claims per patent: -100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R32041 · Foreign Corporation #32,041 · 8 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
MID-PACK #32,041/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Imris
CPC-NARROW G11C · 9 areas
INNOV-THIN 24.6/100
CLAIMS-PAR 10.8 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DROP -100% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Imris, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Industrial’s 24.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.6 pts (31%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 10.6 pts (43%) Claim depth 6.5 pts (26%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Industrial Bank OF… · this assignee

25
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Industrial's Innovation Score is 24.6/100 (15th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Industrial?

Each dot is one of Industrial’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Industrial’s own 10.8 claims/patent is at or below the 12.1 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Industrial vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Industrial's grants concentrate

Industrial Bank OF Korea is a focused PatentsView assignee: 9 CPC subclasses with 50% of grants classified under G11C (Static Stores). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Industrial sits between Imris, Inc. and Information System Engineering Inc..

Imris

8
Incucomm

8
Indian Space Rese…

8
Indian Statistica…

8
Industro Internat…

8
Inflectis Bioscie…

8
Infopia

8
Information Syste…

8
Industrial Bank O… ◀

8

What this shows Industrial holds 8 patents at rank #32,007, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Industrial

By rank, the assignees closest to #32,007 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G11C (Static Stores)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Industrial's primary technology class.

Industrial's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

25 15th percentile higher than 15% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2017

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Industrial Bank OF Korea patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	2	25.0%
2016	5	62.5%
2017	1	12.5%

Which technologies does Industrial Bank OF Korea patent most?

G11C - Static Stores 4

C09G - Polishing Compositions ; SKI Waxes 4

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 3

C09K - Materials FOR Miscellaneous Applications, NOT Provided FOR Elsewhere 3

C01F - Compounds OF THE Metals Beryllium, Magnesium, Aluminium, Calcium, Strontium, Barium, Radium, Thorium, OR OF THE Rare-earth Metals 2

C01P - Indexing Scheme Relating TO Structural AND Physical Aspects OF Solid Inorganic Compounds 2

C23F - Non-mechanical Removal OF Metallic Material From Surface ; Inhibiting Corrosion OF Metallic Material OR Incrustation IN GENERAL; Multi-step Processes FOR Surface Treatment OF Metallic Material Involving AT Least ONE Process Provided FOR IN Class C23 AND AT Least ONE Process Covered BY Subclass C21d 1

H10B - Electronic Memory Devices 1

H01L - Semiconductor Devices NOT Covered BY Class H10 1

Top 9 of 9 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Industrial Bank OF Korea's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Industrial Bank OF Korea's lead technology class is G11C (Static Stores), 50% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G11C
Ranked #32,041 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Industrial Bank OF Korea against Imris, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 24.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.