Where does Imperial Pools, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Imperial Pools, Inc. ranks #32,025 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Imperial Pools, Inc. hold?

Imperial Pools, Inc. holds 8 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 3 technology areas.

What is Imperial Pools, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Imperial Pools, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 32.0 out of 100 (40th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Imperial Pools, Inc. focus on?

Imperial Pools, Inc.'s top technology area is E04F (Finishing Work ON Buildings, e.g. Stairs, Floors) with 8 patents, ranking #75 of 584 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 3 CPC subclasses total.

Is Imperial Pools, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Imperial Pools, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -60% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Imperial Pools, Inc.'s patents?

Imperial Pools, Inc.'s patents average 25.1 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Imperial Pools, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Imperial Pools, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E04F (Finishing Work ON Buildings, e.g. Stairs, Floors).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Imperial ranks #32,025 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 3 technology areas.

#32,025
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 40th percentile
by Innovation Score (32.0/100): 25.1
avg claims per patent: -60%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R32025 · US Corporation #32,025 · 8 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
MID-PACK #32,025/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Immatics US
CPC-NARROW E04F · 3 areas
INNOV-THIN 32.0/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 25.1 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -60% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Immatics US, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Imperial’s 32.0 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.6 pts (24%) Velocity 3.3 pts (10%) Breadth 6.1 pts (19%) Claim depth 15.0 pts (47%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Imperial Pools · this assignee

32
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Imperial's Innovation Score is 32.0/100 (40th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Imperial?

Each dot is one of Imperial’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Imperial’s own 25.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 17.1 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Imperial vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Imperial's grants concentrate

Imperial Pools, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under E04F (Finishing Work ON Buildings, e.g. Stairs, Floors). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Imperial sits between Immatics US, Inc. and In2Bones, LLC.

Imperial's three-year grant acceleration

Imperial Pools, Inc. shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Immatics US

8
Immunext

8
Immunomic Therape…

8
Imperative Chemic…

8
Implant Sciences

8
Implicit

8
Imprenditore Pty

8
In2bones

8
Imperial Pools ◀

8

What this shows Imperial holds 8 patents at rank #32,079, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Imperial

By rank, the assignees closest to #32,079 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in E04F (Finishing Work ON Buildings)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Imperial's primary technology class.

Imperial's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

32 40th percentile higher than 40% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Imperial Pools, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	2	25.0%
2016	1	12.5%
2018	1	12.5%
2019	1	12.5%
2020	1	12.5%
2023	1	12.5%
2025partial year	1	12.5%

Which technologies does Imperial Pools, Inc. patent most?

E04F - Finishing Work ON Buildings, e.g. Stairs, Floors 8

E04G - SCAFFOLDING; FORMS; SHUTTERING; Building Implements OR Aids, OR Their USE; Handling Building Materials ON THE SITE; Repairing, Breaking-up OR Other Work ON Existing Buildings 8

E04H - Buildings OR Like Structures FOR Particular PURPOSES; Swimming OR Splash Baths OR POOLS; MASTS; FENCING; Tents OR Canopies, IN General 8

Top 3 of 3 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Imperial Pools, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Imperial Pools, Inc.'s lead technology class is E04F (Finishing Work ON Buildings, e.g. Stairs, Floors), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore E04F
Ranked #32,025 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Imperial Pools, Inc. against Immatics US, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 32.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.