Implicit, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Implicit ranks #32,027 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 3 technology areas.
- #32,027
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 12th percentile
- by Innovation Score (23.2/100)
- 15.9
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R32027 · US Corporation #32,027 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #32,027/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Immunomic Therapeutics
- CPC-NARROW H04L · 3 areas
- INNOV-THIN 23.2/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 15.9 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Immunomic Therapeutics, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Implicit’s 23.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Implicit
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Implicit · this assignee 23
Implicit · this assignee
23 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Implicit's Innovation Score is 23.2/100 (12th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Implicit?
Each dot is one of Implicit’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Implicit’s own 15.9 claims/patent is at or below the 20.8 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Implicit's grants concentrate
Implicit, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 87.5% of grants classified under H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Implicit sits between Immunomic Therapeutics, Inc. and InView Technology Corporation.
Who files at Implicit's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Immunomic Therape…
Immunomic Therapeutics, Inc.
8 patents
- Imperative Chemic…
Imperative Chemical Partners Inc.
8 patents
- Imperial Pools
Imperial Pools, Inc.
8 patents
- Implant Sciences
Implant Sciences Corporation
8 patents
- Imprenditore Pty
Imprenditore Pty Ltd.
8 patents
- In2bones
In2Bones, LLC
8 patents
- Insilixa
InSilixa, Inc.
8 patents
- Inview Technology
InView Technology Corporation
8 patents
- Implicit ◀
Implicit, LLC
8 patents
What this shows Implicit holds 8 patents at rank #32,081, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Implicit
By rank, the assignees closest to #32,081 in granted patent volume.
- Immunomic Therapeutics, Inc. #32,077 · 8 patents
- Imperative Chemical Partners Inc. #32,078 · 8 patents
- Imperial Pools, Inc. #32,079 · 8 patents
- Implant Sciences Corporation #32,080 · 8 patents
- Imprenditore Pty Ltd. #32,082 · 8 patents
- In2Bones, LLC #32,083 · 8 patents
- InSilixa, Inc. #32,084 · 8 patents
- InView Technology Corporation #32,085 · 8 patents
Leaders in H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Implicit's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 15,969 in class
- Qualcomm Incorporated 13,594 in class
- Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. 11,697 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 10,543 in class
- LG Electronics Inc. 9,062 in class
- Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) 8,543 in class
- Cisco Technology, Inc. 7,502 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 7,301 in class
Implicit's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
23 12th percentile higher than 12% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2016 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2017 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2018 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | 12.5% |
Which technologies does Implicit, LLC patent most?
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Implicit, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Implicit, LLC's lead technology class is H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication), 87.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04L
- Ranked #32,027 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Implicit, LLC against Immunomic Therapeutics, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 23.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.