Where does Imperative Chemical Partners Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Imperative Chemical Partners Inc. ranks #32,024 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Imperative Chemical Partners Inc. hold?

Imperative Chemical Partners Inc. holds 8 US utility patents granted between 2021 and 2025, spanning 2 technology areas.

What is Imperative Chemical Partners Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Imperative Chemical Partners Inc. has an Innovation Score of 19.9 out of 100 (6th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Imperative Chemical Partners Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for Imperative Chemical Partners Inc..

What does claim depth mean for Imperative Chemical Partners Inc.'s patents?

Imperative Chemical Partners Inc.'s patents average 1.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Imperative Chemical Partners Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Imperative Chemical Partners Inc.

Q: What technology areas does Imperative Chemical Partners Inc. focus on?

Imperative Chemical Partners Inc.'s top technology area is E21B (Earth OR Rock DRILLING; Obtaining OIL, GAS, Water, Soluble OR Meltable Materials OR A Slurry OF Minerals From Wells) with 8 patents, ranking #449 of 1,363 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 2 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2021–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E21B (Earth OR Rock DRILLING; Obtaining OIL, GAS, Water, Soluble OR Meltable Materials OR A Slurry OF Minerals From Wells).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Imperative ranks #32,024 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 2 technology areas.

#32,024
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 6th percentile
by Innovation Score (19.9/100): 1.0
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R32024 · US Corporation #32,024 · 8 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
MID-PACK #32,024/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Imerys Filtration…
CPC-NARROW E21B · 2 areas
INNOV-LOW 19.9/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
SPAN-YRS 2021–2025 · 5y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Imerys Filtration Minerals, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Imperative’s 19.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.6 pts (38%) Velocity 6.7 pts (34%) Breadth 5.0 pts (25%) Claim depth 0.6 pts (3%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Imperative Chemical… · this assignee

20
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Imperative's Innovation Score is 19.9/100 (6th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Imperative?

Each dot is one of Imperative’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Imperative’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 17.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Imperative vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Imperative's grants concentrate

Imperative Chemical Partners Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under E21B (Earth OR Rock DRILLING; Obtaining OIL, GAS, Water, Soluble OR Meltable Materials OR A Slurry OF Minerals From Wells). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2023. By volume, Imperative sits between Imerys Filtration Minerals, Inc. and Imprenditore Pty Ltd..

Imperative's three-year grant acceleration

Imperative Chemical Partners Inc. shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Imerys Filtration…

8
Immatics US

8
Immunext

8
Immunomic Therape…

8
Imperial Pools

8
Implant Sciences

8
Implicit

8
Imprenditore Pty

8
Imperative Chemic… ◀

8

What this shows Imperative holds 8 patents at rank #32,078, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Imperative

By rank, the assignees closest to #32,078 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in E21B (Earth OR Rock Drilling)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Imperative's primary technology class.

Imperative's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

20 6th percentile higher than 6% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2021–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2021–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Imperative Chemical Partners Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2021	3	37.5%
2023	1	12.5%
2024	2	25.0%
2025partial year	2	25.0%

Which technologies does Imperative Chemical Partners Inc. patent most?

E21B - Earth OR Rock DRILLING; Obtaining OIL, GAS, Water, Soluble OR Meltable Materials OR A Slurry OF Minerals From Wells 8

G01N - Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties 5

Top 2 of 2 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Imperative Chemical Partners Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Imperative Chemical Partners Inc.'s lead technology class is E21B (Earth OR Rock DRILLING; Obtaining OIL, GAS, Water, Soluble OR Meltable Materials OR A Slurry OF Minerals From Wells), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore E21B
Ranked #32,024 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Imperative Chemical Partners Inc. against Imerys Filtration Minerals, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 19.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.