USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Imaging Systems Technology, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 17 granted patents across 12 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H01J (Electric Discharge Tubes OR Discharge Lamps).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Imaging ranks #16,878 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 17 patents across 12 technology areas.

#16,878
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
27th percentile
by Innovation Score (28.4/100)
10.3
avg claims per patent
-100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R16878 · US Corporation #16,878 · 17 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 17 grants
  • MID-PACK #16,878/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Iconix
  • CPC-FOCUS H01J · 12 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 28.4/100
  • CLAIMS-PAR 10.3 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -100% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Iconix, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Imaging’s 28.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Imaging

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Imaging's Innovation Score is 28.4/100 (27th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Imaging?

Each dot is one of Imaging’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Imaging’s own 10.3 claims/patent is at or below the 10.8 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Imaging vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 16.916.91717.1 0510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Interquim, S.A. - 17, 11.29InterquimIshikawa Gasket Co., Ltd. - 17, 5Ishikawa GasketIV Technologies Co., Ltd - 17, 22.71IVIconix, Inc. - 17, 20.18IconixImpact Sports Technologies, Inc. - 17, 7.35Impact SportsInfinite Peripherals, Inc. - 17, 10.76Infinite Peripher…Innophos, LLC - 17, 7.65InnophosInstitute of Engineering Thermophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences - 17, 13.18Institute of Engi…Imaging Systems Technology, Inc. - 17, 10.29Imaging Systems T…
Imaging vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Imaging's grants concentrate

Imaging Systems Technology, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 12 CPC subclasses with 58.8% of grants classified under H01J (Electric Discharge Tubes OR Discharge Lamps). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (11 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Imaging sits between Interquim, S.A. and Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Who files at Imaging's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Imaging holds 17 patents at rank #16,890, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Imaging

By rank, the assignees closest to #16,890 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H01J (Electric Discharge Tubes OR Discharge Lamps)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Imaging's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Imaging, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In H01J (Electric Discharge Tubes OR Discharge Lamps), Imaging ranks #205 of 1,076 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Imaging's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

28 27th percentile higher than 27% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

051015 20152016201720182019 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2019

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Imaging Systems Technology, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 11 64.7%
2016 1 5.9%
2017 2 11.8%
2018 2 11.8%
2019 1 5.9%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Imaging Systems Technology, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Imaging Systems Technology, Inc.'s lead technology class is H01J (Electric Discharge Tubes OR Discharge Lamps), 58.8% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H01J
  • Ranked #16,878 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Imaging Systems Technology, Inc. against Interquim, S.A., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 28.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.