Where does Pro-Cord S.p.A. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Pro-Cord S.p.A. ranks #13,628 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Pro-Cord S.p.A. hold?

Pro-Cord S.p.A. holds 22 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 1 technology areas.

What is Pro-Cord S.p.A.'s Innovation Score?

Pro-Cord S.p.A. has an Innovation Score of 28.4 out of 100 (27th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Pro-Cord S.p.A. focus on?

Pro-Cord S.p.A.'s top technology area is A47C (CHAIRS; SOFAS; Beds) with 16 patents, ranking #44 of 728 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 1 CPC subclasses total.

Is Pro-Cord S.p.A.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Pro-Cord S.p.A.'s recent grant velocity is -76% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Pro-Cord S.p.A.'s patents?

Pro-Cord S.p.A.'s patents average 6.7 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Pro-Cord S.p.A. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Pro-Cord S.p.A.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 22 granted patents across 1 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A47C (CHAIRS; SOFAS; Beds).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Pro-cord ranks #13,628 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 22 patents across 1 technology areas.

#13,628
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 27th percentile
by Innovation Score (28.4/100): 6.7
avg claims per patent: -76%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R13628 · Foreign Corporation #13,628 · 22 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 22 grants
MID-PACK #13,628/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Plant Development…
CPC-NARROW A47C · 1 areas
INNOV-THIN 28.4/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 6.7 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DROP -76% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Plant Development Services, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Pro-cord’s 28.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 10.8 pts (38%) Velocity 10.0 pts (35%) Breadth 3.5 pts (12%) Claim depth 4.0 pts (14%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Edmonds Outdoors · near

28
Imaging Systems… · near

28
Pro-Cord S p A · this assignee

28
Black Gold Coin · near

28
Keycore Technology · near

28
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Pro-cord's Innovation Score is 28.4/100 (27th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Pro-cord?

Each dot is one of Pro-cord’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Pro-cord’s own 6.7 claims/patent is at or below the 17.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Pro-cord vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Pro-cord's grants concentrate

Pro-Cord S.p.A. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 1 CPC subclasses with 72.7% of grants classified under A47C (CHAIRS; SOFAS; Beds). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (6 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Pro-cord sits between Plant Development Services, Inc. and Provincial Health Services Authority.

Pro-cord's three-year grant acceleration

Pro-Cord S.p.A. shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Plant Development…

22
Pluribus Networks

22
Pramana

22
Primera Technology

22
Products Unlimited

22
Protiva Biotherap…

22
Prove Identity

22
Provincial Health…

22
Pro-cord S p A ◀

22

What this shows Pro-Cord holds 22 patents at rank #13,630, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Pro-Cord

By rank, the assignees closest to #13,630 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A47C (Chairs)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Pro-Cord's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Pro-Cord, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A47C (Chairs), Pro-Cord ranks #44 of 728 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (28 here).

Black Gold Coin, Inc. 28 Edmonds Outdoors, LLC 28 Imaging Systems Technology, Inc. 28 Keycore Technology Corp. 28

Pro-cord's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

28 27th percentile higher than 27% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Pro-Cord S.p.A. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	3	13.6%
2016	6	27.3%
2017	2	9.1%
2018	5	22.7%
2019	1	4.5%
2021	1	4.5%
2024	3	13.6%
2025partial year	1	4.5%

Which technologies does Pro-Cord S.p.A. patent most?

A47C - CHAIRS; SOFAS; Beds 16

Top 1 of 1 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Pro-Cord S.p.A.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Pro-Cord S.p.A.'s lead technology class is A47C (CHAIRS; SOFAS; Beds), 72.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A47C
Ranked #13,628 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Pro-Cord S.p.A. against Plant Development Services, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 28.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.