Ikamper Co., Ltd.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B60P (Vehicles Adapted FOR Load Transportation OR TO Transport, TO Carry, OR TO Comprise Special Loads OR Objects).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Ikamper ranks #40,854 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 4 technology areas.
- #40,854
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 22nd percentile
- by Innovation Score (27.0/100)
- 10.8
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R40854 · Foreign Corporation #40,854 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #40,854/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH IGT UK Interactive
- CPC-NARROW B60P · 4 areas
- INNOV-THIN 27.0/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 10.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- SPAN-YRS 2020–2025 · 6y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: IGT UK Interactive Limited (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Ikamper’s 27.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Ikamper
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Ikamper · this assignee 27
Ikamper · this assignee
27 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Ikamper's Innovation Score is 27.0/100 (22nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Ikamper?
Each dot is one of Ikamper’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Ikamper’s own 10.8 claims/patent is at or below the 17.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Ikamper's grants concentrate
Ikamper Co., Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 83.3% of grants classified under B60P (Vehicles Adapted FOR Load Transportation OR TO Transport, TO Carry, OR TO Comprise Special Loads OR Objects). By volume, Ikamper sits between IGT UK Interactive Limited and Illumitex, Inc..
Ikamper's three-year grant acceleration
Ikamper Co., Ltd. shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Ikamper's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- IGT UK Interactive
IGT UK Interactive Limited
6 patents
- IHI Ionbond
IHI Ionbond AG.
6 patents
- IHI Southwest
IHI Southwest Technologies
6 patents
- IHS Global
IHS Global Inc.
6 patents
- IKS
IKS Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- Illuma Labs
Illuma Labs Inc.
6 patents
- Illuminate Consul…
Illuminate Consulting, LLC
6 patents
- Illumitex
Illumitex, Inc.
6 patents
- Ikamper ◀
Ikamper Co., Ltd.
6 patents
What this shows Ikamper holds 6 patents at rank #40,830, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Ikamper
By rank, the assignees closest to #40,830 in granted patent volume.
- IGT UK Interactive Limited #40,826 · 6 patents
- IHI Ionbond AG. #40,827 · 6 patents
- IHI Southwest Technologies #40,828 · 6 patents
- IHS Global Inc. #40,829 · 6 patents
- IKS Co., Ltd. #40,831 · 6 patents
- Illuma Labs Inc. #40,832 · 6 patents
- Illuminate Consulting, LLC #40,833 · 6 patents
- Illumitex, Inc. #40,834 · 6 patents
Leaders in B60P (Vehicles Adapted FOR Load Transportation OR TO Transport)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Ikamper's primary technology class.
Ikamper's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
27 22nd percentile higher than 22% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2021 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2022 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2023 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2025partial year | 2 | 33.3% |
Which technologies does Ikamper Co., Ltd. patent most?
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Ikamper Co., Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Ikamper Co., Ltd.'s lead technology class is B60P (Vehicles Adapted FOR Load Transportation OR TO Transport, TO Carry, OR TO Comprise Special Loads OR Objects), 83.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B60P
- Ranked #40,854 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Ikamper Co., Ltd. against IGT UK Interactive Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 27.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.